Topics Topics Edit Profile Profile Help/Instructions Help   FIGU-Website FIGU-Website
Search Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View FIGU-Shop FIGU-Shop

Archive through June 30, 2010

Discussionboard of FIGU » The Planet Earth » Third (fourth) world war based on FIGU material » Archive through June 30, 2010 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norm
Member

Post Number: 1377
Registered: 02-2000
Posted on Saturday, June 12, 2010 - 04:11 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hunter, please point me to where it says that in the notes. Thanx
My Website
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norm
Member

Post Number: 1378
Registered: 02-2000
Posted on Monday, June 14, 2010 - 10:08 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Info on break up of USA. Has there been anymore info on that?
My Website
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 248
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 12:32 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

allo Mr Meier,

I very glad to hear Obama is good person and president. Has Obama getting elected stopped the fear of world war 3? If he gets killed (soon), how does the future threat of WW3 look? Is world safe if he completes 2 terms office?

It would be very favourable if Obama would complete two terms in office. He really has the personal possibility to prevent WW3.



This gulf oil spill has stained Obama's presidency. I hope this isn't the thing that denies him getting elected for 2nd term in office. This is the last thing that he/WE need.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1044
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 10:00 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> How so??? Obama didn't spill the oil, BP did, thus it is THERE fault...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1045
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 03:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> Oops "their" fault :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Simpsonj
New member

Post Number: 1
Registered: 06-2010
Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 02:24 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

one most remember that if obama had not won we would be dealing with warmongers mccain ,palin and hillary who would have already gone to war with the equally warmongering iran president.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 249
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 11:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

People are already talking about his handling of the crisis. Not that Obama's done anything wrong so far imo, but, this crisis is not going to win this president (or any other) many new voters. Just the opposite. That is what I meant earlier.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 250
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - 08:38 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't live in the US, but, a lot of people for many years are going to be affected by this oil spill that got worse and worse and worse, and Obama did nothing (really) until now so far. And going into next election I presume his opponents will play this card and claim that if he had done more at the start (instead of nothing) the catastraphy would not have gotten this bad. I think this could have the potential to sway a lot of people away from Obama. I don't know. I hope I am wrong with all this.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1051
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - 10:56 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> What should Obama do Darren? He's the president not an oil company.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 251
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 12:04 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't know Thomas, but, people are already questioning his handling of the crisis, or be it, his lack of it. They are saying he should have acted or done something more quickly at the start instead of leaving it all up to BP to take care of.
btw I'm not trying to lay blame outside of BP.

Obama's miserable handling of the Oil crisis
2 mins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfWPLDu4T2Q&feature=related


Rudy Giuliani on Obama's handling of Gulf oil crisis:

3 mins

http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/06/11/rudy-giuliani-on-obamas-handling-of-gulf-oil-crisis-there-seems-to-be-a-schizophrenic-atmosphere-to-the-way-this-emergencys-been-handled.php

Giuliani says the federal government has failed the American people in its handling of the crisis, and that's mainly because of the President.
"The Obama administration has gone from putting BP in charge to condemning BP to prosecuting them for crimes or investigating them for crimes," said Giuliani.......
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Earthling
Member

Post Number: 452
Registered: 05-2008
Posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 03:34 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jon Stewart laid into President Obama last night for failing to live up to many of the promises made before the election - human rights issues like habeas corpus and rendition - juxtaposing video from his campaign with his current actions.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/16/stewart-critiques-obama-f_n_613937.html

=========================

From the 49 Questions Booklet available from FIGU, it says regarding WW3: "This war will occur, powerfully and unexpectedly, during mockingly peaceful times."

and

"Let it be said: WORLD WAR III will certainly come. WORLD WAR III will occur as surely as a priest says "Amen" at the end of a cult religion's prayer. This third world inferno can no longer be averted, and a great portion of the blame must rest with the religious cults."

=========

Don't these statements contradict later statements by Billy and Ptaah that WW3 is NOT an inevitability?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Sonik_01
Member

Post Number: 143
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 09:31 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hello Earthling,

You have to remember that the Third World Fire (WWIII) is a prophecy and not a prediction. The statements made in the book of 49 questions are from the 1990's well before it was known that we would make it throught the Bush Jr. Presidency. I think Billy's comments stating that Obama may prevent the Third World War are more accurate and that we may indeed not need to experience the agonies of this prophecized event. Keep your fingers crossed!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1055
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 - 10:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> When did BEAM say that Obama might prevent the third world war? I don't > recall seeing that anywhere.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Sonik_01
Member

Post Number: 144
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Friday, June 18, 2010 - 12:23 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Thomas,

Check Darren's post #248, or if you don't believe Darren, look through the Questions to Billy --Answered section.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Smukhuti
Member

Post Number: 386
Registered: 06-2009
Posted on Friday, June 18, 2010 - 12:02 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Billy did say that with Obama, there is chance of averting third world war.

quote:

Victor

allo Mr Meier,

I very glad to hear Obama is good person and president. Has Obama getting elected stopped the fear of world war 3? If he gets killed (soon), how does the future threat of WW3 look? Is world safe if he completes 2 terms office?

thank you for answering my question

It would be very favourable if Obama would complete two terms in office. He really has the personal possibility to prevent WW3.
Billy



With people question Obama's handling of the oil crisis and his presidency, Obama in turn, is questioning U.S.America's ever increasing dependancy on foreign oil and calling it a national security threat. Obamas's recognition of the bigger picture is being underreported by news media. We have an American President, who recognise the danger from petroleum lobby and its clout and is at least talking about it. That's a good thing.
Salome.
Suv
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1057
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Friday, June 18, 2010 - 04:35 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> Thanks for the info :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Ymmit1988
New member

Post Number: 4
Registered: 12-2009
Posted on Sunday, June 20, 2010 - 12:25 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Didn't Meier say that the third world war will start in november and could be instigated by an attack on Iran. If so whats happening at the moment would fit in nicely. The Iranians are still intent on getting food through to the Gaza strip and Israel is if anything behaving in an intentionally provocative way, jumping on boats and getting caught assasinating people using British Passports. The Americans are trying to impose sanctions on Iran only further increasing the political tension. It seems to me to have the potential for a perfect storm, what does every else think?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Ymmit1988
Member

Post Number: 12
Registered: 12-2009
Posted on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 03:34 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Update: A massive fleet of US and Israeli warships been allowed through the Suez Canal and are hauled up in the Persian Gulf. Simultaneously US/Israeli troops are amassing in Uzbekistan as the Iranians move into defensive positions...Gulp!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Indi
Moderator

Post Number: 501
Registered: 06-2006
Posted on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 05:48 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ymmit1988, is it possible that you have jumped to conclusions and taken info out of context as have many sites out there on the web?

From the official Navy site
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=54194


USS HARRY S. TRUMAN, At Sea (NNS) -- Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group (CSG) entered the 5th Fleet area of responsibility (AOR) June 18 after completing a successful transit through the Suez Canal.

Truman CSG is relieving Dwight D. Eisenhower CSG as part of a routine rotation of forces during a scheduled deployment in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, Maritime Security Operations (MSO) and theater security cooperation (TSC) efforts in the region.


So, is it possible that this is a 'routine rotation of forces'?

Robyn
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Sitkaa
Member

Post Number: 311
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Friday, June 25, 2010 - 01:25 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ymmit1998:

Yes, we may be pushed into world war over Israel. And we could melt the planet. And storms and volcanoes and earthquakes could kill us all, as could corporate greed through genetically altered bacteria, and nano-machines, and crop shortages, and even evil aliens intent on dominating our crazy planet.

Fear, the world is rife with it. You don't need to emphasize that here on the FIGU forum. As Peter pointed out, we all go overboard sometimes. It is easy to do in this insane place.
Love is always the way
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Markcampbell
Member

Post Number: 505
Registered: 10-2008
Posted on Friday, June 25, 2010 - 08:14 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I could think that giant hawks might carry many of us away and the ones that are left will go to war with the absence of us , creating a debt of retribution and further insanity due to the lack of retaliation which will be percieved as an insult .

But probably not .
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Thomas
Member

Post Number: 1081
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Friday, June 25, 2010 - 09:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

> Actually BEAM has travelled to the future of Earth and it and we are still > there. He won't give more details on this though. So nothing is going to > eradicate Earth humans altogether...not even ourselves.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Edward
Member

Post Number: 1824
Registered: 05-2002
Posted on Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - 03:58 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Sitkaa....

Plejarans did mention that Obama should be Cautious not to - give in - too
much to Israel. Backing Israel would only simplify their task in Controlling
the region, dominate. And which may/can escalate into the Third World War
scenario.

And, if the Third War World scenario should become a reality, the world will
STILL keep turning...but only with lesser human beings. Man, will not be
extinct.

There will always been a number which will just 'pick up the grain' from
there...and exist further....Logically...speaking.


Edward.

Administration Administration Log Out Log Out   Previous Page Previous Page Next Page Next Page