| Author |
Message |
   
Matt
Member
Post Number: 195
Registered: 04-2006
| | Posted on Monday, August 22, 2011 - 10:34 pm: | 
|
"Well, it is mentioned in the Meier Materials, that those you mentioned in High
Levels, and cohorts, etc., let the 9/11 events take place:....."
Hi Edward,
The US didn't just let 9/11 happen, they HELPED it happen to the extent that it did. The smoking gun is building 7. I thought Billy and the P's deliberately stopped short of saying the US's involvement in 9/11, leaving it up to others to do their own research and make their minds up. As you know theres plenty of info on it out there.
"Any guesses for these 2 places ?"
Hi Mahigitam,
Yes, they are surely both in the southern part of the Southern Hemisphere because it is said that the whole Northern Hemisphere will be unable to be habitable if ww3 happens. My guess would be somewhere in Australia, New Zealand or perhaps somewhere in the southern part of South America. |
Alagna
Member
Post Number: 25
Registered: 07-2011
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 - 07:11 pm: |
|
Hi Mahigitam,
Contact 142 took place in 1981, and they were talking about "billions" to pay for a Figu hideout. This would have been a lot of money for governments at the time, let alone Billy and his group. Since we know that the first place was "neutral" and had a harsh 'climate' also... my first guess would be the Moon. Anywhere terrestrial would not cost "billions" in 1981, in my opinion. Maybe if Billy had billions at his disposal he might have supported a Private-Swiss space race/colonization to the moon by the mid to late 90s?
The second place would also cost a lot of dough too; they were talking "millions" at the time. And since it has a climate, we are not talking about an undersea base... my guess on this one would be Antarctica.
It is strange to me that they were talking such large sums of money to make a move and establish a base. For the most part Switzerland is more expensive than anything in the southern hemisphere; it might have been cheaper to build a Center in say New Zealand or Australia.
Cheers,
Anthony |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2167
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 12:03 am: |
|
Hi Matt...
Yes, I am aware of your input.
MAN, has yet sill...to put the Whole Puzzle together, yes...
NAMES, etc.....
Confirmation facts, etc....[Will the REAL Puppeteers...stand up, please.... ]
Edward. |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2168
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 12:17 am: |
|
Hi Guys...
My first ideas were also as to it referring to Antarctica, and of course, the
Southern lower spheres where there is no/less contamination of Radio Activity
and Fall Out, which would be Australia,(New Zealand,) which the Plejarans have
mentioned, in the past.
Not only Radio Activity will be culprit: ALL the dead bodies decaying, etc.,
and which will create new types of Pestilence, etc. Very unhealthy!!
Edward. |
Joe_ottawa
Member
Post Number: 5
Registered: 06-2011
| | Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 - 05:34 am: |
|
Hi All,
I found this piece of information at
http://theyfly.com/news2005/november06/november06.htm#quake
And found it confusing. Tried checking the discussion board but it so vast, I couldn’t find what I was looking for. I have copied and pasted the question and answer below.
Question:
Recently in a speech US President Bush said: "If the United States of America were to leave before the job is done, the enemy would follow us here. And that is why we will support our military. And that is why we will fight in Iraq. And that is why we will win in Iraq." The American public next week has an opportunity to vote the other party into one or both houses of Congress, dampening the Bush rubber stamp. However, if the Bush mentality continues and the US pursues its plans in Iraq unabated, is the principal phase of the third world fire inevitable?
Answer:
Thanks to the result of the US elections which brought a majority for the democrats, the threat of the WWW III to break out in 2006 has been eliminated. (There were plans for a war for the end of November in case the republicans would have won the elections.) However, there still remains a dangerous situation because Israel has secret plans to attack the nuclear plants in Iran."
George W. Bush was President from 2001-2009, Barack Obama was Elected in 2009 – Present, so in the answer portion where it reads “Thanks to the result of the US elections which brought a majority for the democrats, the threat of the WWW III to break out in 2006 has been eliminated”. The republicans were in power during that period of 2006 so you can see the confusion. Am I missing something?
Many Thanks
joe_ottawa |
Smukhuti
Member
Post Number: 606
Registered: 06-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, August 28, 2011 - 01:07 am: |
|
Hi Joe_ottawa,
That referred to the mid-term election in 2006.
"The flower which is single need not envy the thorns that are numerous." - Tagore
|
Kingman
Member
Post Number: 877
Registered: 07-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, August 28, 2011 - 09:21 pm: |
|
Joe,
The Democrats took over the House of Representatives in 2006 during a midterm election(not an election for a president) and put a stop to the complete Republican control of the government.
a friend in america
Shawn
|
Joe_ottawa
Member
Post Number: 6
Registered: 06-2011
| | Posted on Monday, August 29, 2011 - 04:22 am: |
|
Excellent thanks for the clarification. |
Sonik_01
Member
Post Number: 232
Registered: 03-2006
| | Posted on Friday, September 16, 2011 - 07:57 pm: |
|
Hi everyone,
Greece has decided to remain part of the Eurozone. As we all know, greece is the poorest country with the largest debt in the Eurozone, and other countries are struggling to keep them afloat. What do people thinkÉ (É comes up instead of question mark on my keyboard) If Greece goes down and takes the Eurozone with them, will we have a WWIIIÉ Why or why notÉ Please explain your answer.
Thank You.
Sonik_01 |
Cpl
Member
Post Number: 567
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Friday, September 16, 2011 - 10:17 pm: |
|
Hi Sonik,
Just my opinion or idea you understand:
If WWIII occurs the Henoch Prophecies suggest it will be gradual. I think you'd see gradual military actions and wars over the decades, escalating. I don't think you'll see someone stand up and say, "We declare war on the world", certainly not from the Eurozone failing, which IMO, is highly likely and will cause immense problems. IMO Greece will default because there is really no way out. Others will likely then follow. It is when the bigger economies like Spain, Portugal, Italy and maybe France fail that the real problems will ensue. If Italian banks go under then the US GE looses its pension fund affecting the livelihoods of countless Americans for starters. That's just one bank in one country and its effects on one company. Upon a failed Eurozone, with the ensuing economic debacle we could very likely see riots and perhaps even revolutions in Europe especially if the union itself dissolves, which I and many others see as highly likely. The riots and mayhem could possibly then even spread to the US. How people will react though is impossible to say; hopefully reason and calm will prevail.
Trouble is, when we look at history it is often in times of great economic hardship that the seeds of war are sown. It led to Hitler's rise, and was one propagandized excuse for the US to enter the war: "It'll get manufacturing going again."
Already it looks like Obama will lose the next election because of the bad economic figures and realities. IMO if people could keep their heads and keep Obama in power the chances of war will remain slight. But will the populace demand the government do something for the economy instead?
The danger as I see it then is that we could witness a growing malaise and economic debacle spreading around the world. In such an environment any number of events could send sparks into the global tinderbox. It wouldn't need to start in Europe. What if the ME upset spreads into Saudi Arabia and oil is cut off to the west as a result -- on top of a failed Eurozone? What if Israel should decide it cannot continue living in fear of a Nuclear Iran any longer?
There are so many possibilities for volatile emotional responses leading to military action (war) if humanity doesn't control its emotions.
What we need to do is to see to it that this doesn't happen. It may not be easy but that, as I see it, must be our focus: Each person has to answer how to best do that in their own way, but basically guidance is here on the website and in Billy's writings to that effect.
May peace prevail on earth.
Chris
Use to the full both your heart and your head; and never lose either.
|
Michael_horn
Member
Post Number: 450
Registered: 07-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, September 18, 2011 - 04:27 pm: |
|
As far as the election goes, it's possible that the Republicans will cannibalize themselves with the candidates each trying to out-Christian or out-conservative each other.
Ron Paul is gaining in popularity, which means watch out for some sudden "health problem" should he become too big a threat.
Of course if a Republican wins it will mean war, big time, which is what the conservative push is leading up to. If you read www.drudgereport.com EVERYthing that goes wrong anywhere is Obama's fault.
So, should these parasites get what they want, they may have some surprises coming when the wrecking ball returns to America, when the rest of the world has had enough of the warmongering. |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2198
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Sunday, September 18, 2011 - 02:32 am: |
|
Hi Sonik....
Chris does have some interesting points, there.
But, surely there will NOT be an outbreak of World War Three, as you
mentioned!
Our times are quite different than in the days of Hitler(; similar, but not
the same...). And there is indeed no figure in any shape or form which would
resemble a Hitler type figure whom would want to start a War: World War
Three.
Billy/Ptaah did explain, that those wealthy families whom RULE man of Earth,
do not really need a war in the scale of World War Three. They know better,
now. If they would ignite a World War Three scenario they would have NO Power
and Influence over the world and it's people; They would only live in a world
of Chaos and Destruction, which is NO way to rule a world that is Decaying,
no?
So, to keep THEIR world going, they do need to aid each other as much as they
can. And as long as they are Allies....they are to some point Obligated...to
help one and other, in what ever way; that is what Allies are for. Thus, it
does seems quite Logical that they are...aiding Greece as much as they can;
you can just NOT drop a country and say...'bye bye..', no? That is just not
how it works.
If World War Three would be ignited...it would be done by Politicians and not
per se the Wealthy, as I mentioned, a world that is Destroyed and Decaying is
NOT their world...to Dominate; perhaps only, the Weapon Industry would make
Profit, but....for HOW long? But, this too....is just temporary. They will
collapse...too.
Edward. |
Matt
Member
Post Number: 198
Registered: 04-2006
| | Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 03:17 am: |
|
Hi Michael,
That frightens me. I'm unsure what to think now. According to the WW3 prophecies, aren't we nearly out of the danger time/zone? What years is the War supposed to take place if it does happen? |
Sonik_01
Member
Post Number: 233
Registered: 03-2006
| | Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 05:14 am: |
|
Very interesting ideas, guys - Thanks a lot for your input.
Sonik_01
Salome |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2200
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 11:44 pm: |
|
Hi Matt...
A Word to Third World War
A clarification
When I spoke in my bulletins of a prophecy that points to the years of 2003,
2006, 2010 and 2011, in which a third world war could become a possibility, it
does not refer to a prediction but only to a prophecy. In answering the many
inquiries respectively, it is obvious that it is necessary again to repeat
that the bulletins do not refer to a prediction but to a prophecy, that
reveals the mentioned dates. Prophecies are always changeable, for they do not
rest upon something that forces prophecies to be fulfilled, contrary to
predictions that fulfil themselves with absolute certainty.
Matt, we STILL have to take heed to the fact that after the mentioned years,
there is STILL the possibility, it can STILL occur. I think with a 3-4 years
difference, or something(?). Billy, did mention: World War Four, etc., as I
can recall, in the FIGU Materials. Thus: WE, must ALWAYS be On-guard, for such
Devastating event!
Thus: WE are NEVER...out of the woods, so to speak....
Edward. |
Cpl
Member
Post Number: 569
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 08:34 am: |
|
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warns again that "time is short" before Iran obtains nuclear weapons and poses a direct threat to Israel and the rest of the world.
“Iran poses certainly a great danger to Israel, but it represents an enormous danger to the Middle East and to the world,” Netanyahu said to PBS’s Charlie Rose, during a recent visit to New York to speak at the United Nations.
For the full report see: http://news.newsmax.com/?Z6Ov.toaL50Ah4Xr9Tceohu7z3ykbfvAZ.
Hopefully, Israel will not be foolish enough to attack Iran or provoke another country, like America, to do so. May peace prevail on Earth and all wars cease.
Chris
Use to the full both your heart and your head; and never lose either.
|
Derrick
Member
Post Number: 90
Registered: 01-2011
| | Posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 09:30 pm: |
|
Hi Edward,
Yes we are not out of the woods yet but that is the beauty of prophecies..."we" can change them with our thinking. I have not found the information on world war 4. Can you send me a link to that info? The really good thing about this world war 4 thing is that this tells us that ww3 is over. Correct? So we CAN get out of the woods a little Yes?
Peace on Earth and among all beings!
Derrick
Salome |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2212
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 10:53 pm: |
|
Hi Chris....
I think that Natanyahu is MORE OF A THREAT...than Iran, itself!
It was Bill Clinton whom opposed bombing Iran...when the Israelies wanted to,
as was even mentioned by the Plejarans. If Israel would have Bombed Iran..that
could have possibly ignited World War Three!
Nathanyahu, should stop playing 'victim'!
We should take heed to the MANY Victims....Israel has made ever since the
existence of Israel!!
BAD, Nathanyahu...PROPAGANDA!!
Edward. |
Memo00
Member
Post Number: 530
Registered: 03-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 11:06 pm: |
|
Hi Chris
the only thing we can really do is the Peace meditation
Salome |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2215
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 11:30 pm: |
|
Hi Derrick....
You will come across that information as you read the FIGU Materials, further.
That World War Four thing, was easy to remember...because we thought we only
had to deal with World War Three....; could have been in one of the older
Bulletins, etc...
Edward. |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2216
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Monday, October 03, 2011 - 12:04 am: |
|
Hi Derrick....
Just a supplement:
I think it was mentioned in the Bulletin concerning Mr. Bush or in that
direction; World War Three related.
When World War Three breaks out...there will come a time of break. In that
break, new weapons will be manufactured and piled up, to continue further
towards World War Four, etc...
Of course, World War Three is very dependent on HOW MANY Nuclear rockets are
launched! Too many would indeed be enough to demobilize the targeted counties.
If, this is not the case, World War Four can just proceed as mentioned in the
Prophecy, and Five, etc. THAT is up to the Government Politicians, I would
say.
Obama, officially signed a bill...NOT to be the first country(US) to launch a
Nuclear strike; some time ago. So, if up to him...perhaps much can be
averted? Unless, "the Government WITHIN the Government"...has other ideas??
Edward. |
Cpl
Member
Post Number: 570
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Monday, October 03, 2011 - 07:10 am: |
|
Hi Memo,
I'm sure the peace meditation is just fine for many here.
Because WWIII is a prophecy we humans can stop it. There are all kinds of people in the world and all kinds of ways that any person or people may stop or help prevent WWIII in their own ways. Every act we perform has its effects and there is no way of knowing all the effects of all our acts and words. Something one person says or does can affect another unknowingly that effects another that may lead to real effect down the line on a position of power somewhere that results in a change of policy toward peace instead of war.
It is not just a matter of, "I have to stop WWIII." Or "What can I do to stop WWIII?" It is not an all or nothing situation.
In the last election thousands of Americans helped prevent WWIII, at least for a while, by merely voting for Obama, all for their own personal reasons. Perhaps only a minute minority were thinking he'd prevent WWIII and so voted for him, but the majority voted for him thinking it the right thing to do, and this led to a preventive effect.
Every act and word we utter in tune with Creation is on course to preventing war. In short, I would say there is no end to what we can do here; and it might not even take thinking about war at all for many to accomplish it. It just requires us to live right in our thoughts, words and actions, as best we can.
Chris
Use to the full both your heart and your head; and never lose either.
|
Corey
Member
Post Number: 38
Registered: 12-2009
| | Posted on Monday, October 03, 2011 - 08:49 am: |
|
I think WW4 was mentioned in AYTF in the contact 251 summary if Im not mistaken...
Salome
Corey |
|
