| Author | Message | ||
    Gaiaguysnet Member Post Number: 537 Registered: 03-2004 |
Dear Melli, There's something coming up from Ptaah (busybusybusy) about how the UN now reads the FIGU bulletins and RESPONDS to the dire warnings they contain. More on WW3 too. Please see www.gaiaguys.net/meier.whatsnew.htm Cheers! Dyson | ||
Jakes Member Post Number: 81 Registered: 10-2006 |
From Contact 251: These then are the last danger signs, which foretell that within merely 2 years of these events the long-feared world war will indeed erupt, unless terrestrials finally gain mastery over their reasoning to stop all these ills. Should this not be done, mankind will fail in its attempt to protest and boycott the new deadly weapons, because by this time the armories of many nations will be full to their capacity. Passing laws to prohibit the use of these weapons will be ineffective at this late stage. World War III cannot be averted if Man fails to finally become reasonable! From Reuters: China said on Sunday it would boost defense spending by 17.8 percent this year, which follows a 14.7 percent increase in 2006 and is the biggest recorded rise in the past decade. | ||
Jakes Member Post Number: 85 Registered: 10-2006 |
A bad sign for those opposing war efforts. Mar 12, 11:22 PM EDT Dems abandon war authority provision By DAVID ESPO and MATTHEW LEE Associated Press Writers WASHINGTON (AP) -- Top House Democrats retreated Monday from an attempt to limit President Bush's authority for taking military action against Iran as the leadership concentrated on a looming confrontation with the White House over the Iraq war. Officials said Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the leadership had decided to strip from a major military spending bill a requirement for Bush to gain approval from Congress before moving against Iran. | ||
Jakes Member Post Number: 100 Registered: 10-2006 |
From Contact 251: The world war will begin in November of a specific year, after 5 years of intensive effort are spent reaching this goal which is preceded by 4 years of unspecified preparations. Report faults Pentagon for weapons buying problems Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:55PM EDT By Jim Wolf WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Defense Department has doubled its planned investment in new weapons from $750 billion in 2001 to $1.5 trillion this year, but it is not getting enough bang for its buck, congressional investigators said on Friday. 2001 + 9 years = 2010 | ||
Eric_drouin Member Post Number: 154 Registered: 05-2004 |
Friday April 6, 2007 @ 4 AM? (i was hesitating to post the link, but i think you must know what may happen, hoping some positive countermeasure will be taken...as you know to what this will lead up to) http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/03/operation-bite-set-to-attack-iran-april.html | ||
The_future Member Post Number: 6 Registered: 02-2007 |
Eric, not to be critical of you, but Webster Tarpley never seems to get anything right. Operation Bite? Come on, surely they would have a more creative name. The troops won't rally around that. And in his links under "Ministry of Truth", he links to those great legendary truth tellers: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin. No cred. If these fear-mongering guys, like Tarpley, had to give us a nickel for each half-baked prediction that didn't come true...they'd be broke. But instead, they use fear to draw attention to sell books... I first heard of this "information" Thursday on the Big Ed Schultz radio show. Wisely he didn't give it too much credence. Before the Iraq attack, Billy was busy writing warnings to the leaders of all nations, etc. Surely, we are told an attack on Iran will lead to a retaliatory attack by China on Israel, and then the world war will be on. Why is Billy so quiet now? | ||
Eric_drouin Member Post Number: 155 Registered: 05-2004 |
Here is the original from RIA Novosti Russian international press agency, in french http://fr.rian.ru/world/20070319/62260006.html The info is the same as in the other site (i am fluent in both languages) Read on the net everything on Iran, everything point to an attack. Check yourself There is no doubt this info should be taken seriously by for those who care about "the future", (except those of you that have some association with secret services MOSSAD/CIA/NSA and post disinformation here). | ||
Gaiaguysnet Member Post Number: 659 Registered: 03-2004 |
Dear The, Billy and the Plejaren have not been quiet. You simply are not listening. Ptaah, October 15th, published November 29th, 2006: „Nichtsdestoweniger jedoch drohen noch andere Gefahren, die bösartig weltweite Auswirkungen haben können, wie z.B. die Tatsache, dass die verantwortungslosen Mächte Israels geheime Pläne ausgearbeitet haben hinsichtlich einer Raketen- und Luftwaffenattacke gegen die Atomanlagen im Iran.“ (Nevertheless, however, still other dangers threaten which can have malignant worldwide effects, as, for example, the fact that the irresponsible powers of Israel have worked out secret plans regarding a rocket and air-force attack against the atomic facilities in Iran.) (www.gaiaguys.net/meier.p14-16sb31.htm) Just ten weeks ago, Ptaah said, "Wie die Mächtigen und Verantwortlichen der Welt im Jahre 1951 deinen Aufruf ‹An alle Verantwortlichen der Welt› und 1958 deine ‹Warnung an alle Regierungen Europas› in den Wind geschlagen und missachtet haben, so missachten und schlagen heute die Mächtigen und Verantwortlichen der Erde die Tatsache in den Wind, dass du und wir es wahrheitlich waren, die seit Jahrzehnten das voraussagten, was sich heute hinsichtlich der Klimaerwärmung und Klimazerstörung ergibt." (As, in 1951, the mighty and responsible ones of the world threw to the wind and disregarded your appeal 'To all Responsible ones of the World', and in 1958 your 'Warning to all Governments of Europe', so today the mighty and responsible ones of the Earth disregard and throw to the wind the fact that it was truly you and us who, decades ago, predicted what results today in regard to the climatic warming and climatic destruction. (www.gaiaguys.net/meiersb33.htm) Of course the same applies to every single other dire warning Earth people are given over and over and over and over and over again. It is likely that there have been further warnings about Iran, etc. since then as there were in December, but the problem is not so much that there are no warnings given, but that the warnings are not even read. Of course there are some inherent delays between Ptaah’s contact conversations and the time it takes for Billy to transcribe them, the other unpaid FIGU volunteers to get them printed up and published in the FIGU Bulletins, and then the time it takes us to translate them, but we do our best, but we can’t work miracles. Have you seen www.gaiaguys.net/meier.whatsnew.htm & www.gaiaguys.net/meier.htm ? Salome, Dyson | ||
The_future Member Post Number: 9 Registered: 02-2007 |
How time flies and memory fails. Billy is quiet compared to the frenetic period before the Iraq attack when he published the following papers in regards to the impending war (all linked from Michael Horn’s site www.theyfly.com under “Meier's Pre-Iraq War Warnings”). 1.) Billy Meier answers a reader’s question by telephone (Dec 24, 2002) 2.) G.W. Bush and Cohorts (Dec 30, 2002) 3.) To the Statesmen in Power and to Mankind of Earth (Jan 30, 2003) 4.) One More Important Word (Feb 1, 2003) Note: The Iraq War began on March 20, 2003. Today there is no support in the US, or anywhere else in the world, for an unprovoked attack on Iran (see Ex-Aide Says He’s Lost Faith in Bush). http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/washington/01adviser.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin I think everyone acknowledges it would be an unmitigated disaster, especially for the US. Oil would go to $100-200 a barrel, the global economy would suffer/collapse, and a likely world-wide war would ensue. Bush would probably be impeached, and the Democrats would have a lock on the presidency in ’08 - giving them full control. I know a lot of people think Bush is unintelligent, but that doesn’t preclude him from being a shrewd politician. Also, didn’t Billy or Ptaah say the strike on Iran was averted because the Dems took control of Congress last November? You guys will each owe me a nickel after the sixth of April. I’ll even give you 100:1 odds. | ||
Gaiaguysnet Member Post Number: 667 Registered: 03-2004 |
Hi all, I tend to agree with The this time, although we are led to believe (personal correspondence from a close rello of a crew member) that the aircraft carrier Eisenhower might be in Iranian waters already. Anyway, it's more than just about oil, as Scott Ritter said. www.gaiaguys.net/Armageddon.htm (Excerpt from www.gaiaguys.net/specialbulletin16.htm) 372. Kontakt, Freitag, 14. Januar 2005, 00.55 h Contact 372, Friday, January 14th, 2005, 12.55 AM Billy Gut. - Du hast beim letzten Besuch bei unserer privaten Unterhaltung erwähnt, dass der US-Präsident George W. Bush wieder etwas im Schilde führe, und zwar in bezug auf Persien resp. Iran. Billy Good. – In our private conversation on the last visit you mentioned that the US President, George W. Bush, has something up his sleeve again and indeed in regard to Persia, respectively, Iran. Darfst du dazu in offener Form mehr sagen? Are you able you say more about that openly? Ptaah Es handelt sich nicht um ein Geheimnis: Der Mann Bush ist grössenwahnsinnig und der festen Überzeugung, dass er seines Gottes Stellvertreter auf Erden sei und die Welt von allem Bösen befreien müsse. Ptaah It does not concern a secret. The man Bush is megalomaniacal and of the firm persuasion that he is his god’s representative on Earth and must free the world from all evil. Dass er aber selbst gegenwärtig wohl das böseste Übel in bezug auf Krieg und Terror ist, das verdrängt er in seinem sektiererischen Wahn vollkommen. In his sectarian delusion he completely drives out the fact that he himself, however, is presently indeed the worst evil in regard to war and terror. In diesem ist er dermassen gefangen, dass er auch alles Andersgläubige, das nicht seinem eigenen sektiererischen Glauben entspricht, ausrotten will, wobei er ganz besonders den Islam ins Visier genommen hat. He is so captivated by this that he also wants to exterminate all those of other faiths which do not correspond to his own sectarian belief, whereby he has put Islam quite especially in his sights. In diesem Sinn spielen seine Wahnvorstellungen die grösste Rolle, dass er im islamischen Raum die vollkommene Macht ergreifen müsse, um alles unter amerikanische und christliche Herrschaft zu bringen. In this sense his delusional imagination plays the greatest role (behind his idea) that he must seize complete power in the Islamic world in order to bring everything under American and Christian control. Diesbezüglich ist das Nächstliegende für ihn, dass er ein Band amerikanischer Herrschaft von Afghanistan bis zum Irak aufbauen müsse. In regard to this, the next move for him is that he must build a band of American control, from Afghanistan to Iraq. Und zwischen diesen beiden Staaten liegt nur der Iran, der daran interessiert ist, eine nukleare Waffentechnik aufzubauen. And between both these countries lies only Iran, which is interested in building nuclear weapon technology. Genau das aber nimmt Bush zum verlogenen Vorwand, Pläne für einen Angriff auf Iran ausarbeiten zu lassen. But exactly that leads Bush to a mendacious pretext to allow plans to be formulated for an attack on Iran. In gleicher Form hat er schon im Irak gehandelt, wobei aber Ähnliches auch in Afghanistan der Fall war. He has already behaved in the same form in Iraq, whereby the case in Afghanistan was also similar. Was sich daraus ergeben wird, steht leider noch nicht endgültig fest, denn es liegen noch verschiedenste Faktoren offen, die das Ganze noch nicht in einem endgültig klaren Licht erkennen lassen. Unfortunately, what will actually come about from that is not finally certain, because various factors still lie open so that it does not allow the entirety to be recognized in a clear light. Unbestreitbar fest steht jedoch, dass bereits US-amerikanische Geheimkommandos im Iran operieren und Spionage usw. betreiben. However, it stands indisputably clear that already US-American secret commandos carry out operations and espionage, and so forth, in Iran. -When pressed for more info by Billy,Ptaah goes on to say: Ausserdem denke ich, dass es keine wertvollen Früchte tragen wird, wenn ich das tue, denn die Erdenmenschen lassen sich nicht durch Voraussagen belehren, wie du weisst. Moreover I think that it would bear no valuable fruit if I do that, because the Earth human does not let himself be taught through predictions, as you know. Wir haben diesbezüglich nun rund 30 Jahre Erfahrungen gesammelt und erlebt, dass Warnungen fruchtlos sind. Regarding this we have now collected and witnessed around 30 years of experience that warnings are fruitless. ------------- But maybe not, eh? Ptaah was talking on January 14th, 2005, about Bush's 11/06 WWIII which did not happen. Now read what he said just three years later on the 440th contact, January 15th, 2007, relating to the likelihood of a Third World War. "We must wait to see what the future now brings in this regard, whereby one can hope that the course of the US war-opposers, up to this point, is maintained and the same is done by all the other peoples of terrestrial countries, because thereby the danger of a world war is ever more diminished and so the relevant prophecies, in regard to their fulfillment, can be averted. At this time it looks good for that, whereby one can hope that it also stays that way." Lucky once again! Salome, Dyson | ||
Cpl Member Post Number: 245 Registered: 08-2004 |
Just FYI: Cycles of Wars 17.71 years. Despite Iran now agreeing to free the hostages this seems no time to let the guard down. This edited from Larry Edelson’s e-letter "Money and Markets." “Iran crisis still ready to blow ...” Thu, 5 Apr 2007. NB As some have suggested the attack/s could also come from Israel, which Larry doesn't mention below. [Quoting] “An attack on Iran is still in the cards..... An Attack Would Be Swift. The Ramifications Long-Lasting. The U.S. doesn't want a wider war in the Middle East, and certainly not a wider ground war. But at this point, there is no stopping a missile strike to destroy Iran's nuclear ambitions. The strike could be carried out primarily by Britain and the U.S., and it would be over in less than 24 hours. But the implications and consequences could go on for years. We live in a time when war, rumors of war, terrorism, and domestic social unrest are reaching extremes greater than anything we've seen in decades, and I don't think this will peak for at least two more years. I'm basing this on my studies of the "Cycles of War," research that I published and copyrighted in 1988. I first told you about this research last February. I conducted the research in the mid-1980s based on the historical patterns of domestic and international wars over a 2,600-year period. It wasn't guesswork, it was based on solid statistics and a computer program that analyzed hard economic and military data. The pattern was clear: I discovered a 17.71-year cycle of war that has continued to prevail throughout modern history. For example, when I performed my research, the last peak of the war cycle had occurred in 1974, just after the height of the Vietnam War. My model projected 1991 as the next peak. Using more detailed data, in 1988 when I published the research, I fine-tuned the projections and went on record forecasting August 1990 as the point in time when the war cycle would next emerge. In late August 1990, Iraq attacked Kuwait, right on schedule. The Iraq invasion of Kuwait, and the subsequent Gulf War I, was no surprise to me. Fast forward to today: My current data points to April 2008 — one year from now — as the peak of the current cycle. However, the peaks in the war cycle can vary by up to two years in duration. So it's entirely possible we will not see a peak until April 2010. Bottom line: No matter what the exact timeline, I believe things are going to get worse before they get better....” [Quoting ends, remainder edited by cpl] “Best wishes, Larry” Best, cpl | ||
Jakes Member Post Number: 107 Registered: 10-2006 |
Perhaps this is just words, but not all seems peaceful in Russia. Berezovsky says planning Russian revolution: paper Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:14PM EDT LONDON (Reuters) - Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky said he is planning a revolution in Russia to topple President Vladimir Putin, in comments published on Friday. "We need to use force to change this regime," Berezovsky, who has received asylum in Britain, told the Guardian newspaper. "It isn't possible to change this regime through democratic means. There can be no change without force, pressure." Asked if he was fomenting a revolution, he said: "You are absolutely correct." | ||
Rarena Member Post Number: 211 Registered: 10-2005 |
Excellent research CPL. Looking further into statistical data is always a good way to model and understand human "logic"? | ||
Hector Member Post Number: 253 Registered: 04-2006 |
Boris Berezovsky is just an opportunist who waited for his opportunity after the fall of the Ussr, and he grabbed government public industries after their privatization under Yeltsin. Rome(Moscow) does not pay traitors.Berezovski has not invested in Russia these years.He has taken capital away.I do not sympathise with such individuals. If Berezowsky wants for Russia the american "Democracy" then he really hates his country. Democracy cannot be based on greed and unlimited profit.Values which "new" billionaires like Berezovski and Roman Abramovich embrace, trying to convince the world about the convinience of free market, globalization, neoliberalism, wild capitalism, unlimited economic growth etc etc.. Putin is no saint but under his mandate his country has not been an international threat.Russia is living a difficult political transition period and he has not sold the russian economy to foreign hawks.His successor, probably Sergei Lavrov, will face a severe trouble which is installation of NATO missile defense system to be placed in Eastern Europe (Poland, Czech Republic). If the USA is not tactful with that MDS and russian sensibility, cold war sadly will emerge again. | ||
Cpl Member Post Number: 261 Registered: 08-2004 |
Dear all, Christopher Story, an alleged intelligence writer (www.worldreports.org) says the US cities of Minneapolis and St Paul may be targeted for nuclear detonations around 1 September 2008 as an intended “Reichstag Fire”. If these occur it seems they will be followed by limited nuclear attacks on the Middle East intended as a limited and controlled nuclear confrontation. Story says that at this time it is a possibility, not a certainty. If all this starts to transpire, some things possibly to watch for, according to the report, would be: The US ambassador leaving England with his entire staff, England leaving the EU, and the economies of France and Germany tanking. Should these nuclear detonations go off next year, it is highly likely, at least in time, that it will not be contained but lead to a hot WWIII. It’s a long report. The main theme is Wantagate, after the ambassador who US authorities allege is dead, and Story insists, is alive having survived attempts on his life and the stealing of his assets. The following brief memorandum gives some idea as to its content: [Quoting] “LET'S KICK THE AMERICAN AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON FREEZE CRIMINAL UK-BASED U.S. DOLLAR BANK ACCOUNTS.” By Christopher Story, Tuesday 15 May 2007 17:12. http://www.worldreports.org/news/62_lets_kick_the_americ ‘Active Agent’ of the Republican Party who contacted Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., yesterday evening, enquiring about our timely exposure of the intended ‘Reichstag Fire’ that may have been planned for 1st September 2008 at the commencement of the Republican National Convention in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul: Point #1: We exposed this prospective crisis precisely in order to preclude it happening, obviously. Point #2: Details of the exposure are contained in a notarised Affidavit written by this Editor immediately following his unexpected discovery of this prospective abomination, and its conveyance to appropriate authorities in October 2004. Point #3: The Editor’s reasoning and rationale for deciding to make this matter public has been very clearly explained in earlier reports posted on this website. He would not have done this had he thought that the danger was non-existent. It would have been irresponsible, in the prevailing dreadful circumstances, to have withheld publication of the reported information any longer. Point #4: It is well recognised that because your own intelligence colleagues lie all the time, nothing that any of them says to you can be believed, or can ever have any credibility, given the long-term penetration of your intelligence structures by competing criminal gangs and their foreign power clients. Point #5: But on the other hand, you are in a position to demand that the Wantagate saga is brought to an immediate end, and that the stealing of The Queen’s assets is reversed forthwith. [End quoting] The link above has the whole story. It talks about the US administration “stealing” all Queen Elezabeth II’s gold, effectively bankrupting the UK and the Bank of England. They are calling for the return of the massive amounts of gold. If true it throws some light on the Queen’s recent visit to the US and other news events. I cannot comment on the accuracy of this report. I include it merely FYI and discernment and suggest it might be good to pass on. If passed on and others are informed, the plans, if actually formed and intentional, will have far less likelihood of succeeding. Any involved in such plans are likely to back down if there is a lot of talk all over the Internet and elsewhere about this. Attempts to use the element of surprise to manipulate the public to accept or call for a nuclear response in the Middle East and a likely hot Third World War to follow would then be thwarted. Sincerely, Cpl | ||
Jakes Member Post Number: 125 Registered: 10-2006 |
Another bad sign for peace. Putin warns he will point missiles at Europe Sun Jun 3, 2007 5:17PM EDT By Oleg Shchedrov MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin said Russia would go back to its Cold War stance of aiming its missiles at Europe if Washington went ahead with a plan to build a missile defence shield near Russia's borders. In an interview released late on Sunday, Putin acknowledged that Russia's response risked reviving an arms race in Europe but said Moscow would not be responsible for the consequences because Washington had started the escalation. http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL0368100920070603 | ||
Cpl Member Post Number: 267 Registered: 08-2004 |
Here's an update on the Queen's stolen $4 trillion + of gold mentioned above, potential international relations (and stock market) meltdown, and what might be happening in the G8 meeting. Reading between the lines this could create a new alliance between China, Russia and the UK against the US and Germany. If not resolved -- if true -- this situation could easily degenerate into WW III. Link: http://worldreports.org/news/63_mr_bush_sets_out_to_ | ||
Rarena Member Post Number: 245 Registered: 10-2005 |
A Word to Third World War Kategorie: Krieg | Meier E. ('Billy') A clarification When I spoke in my bulletins of a prophecy that points to the years of 2003, 2006, 2010 and 2011, in which a third world war could become a possibility, it does not refer to a prediction but only to a prophecy. In answering the many inquiries respectively, it is obvious that it is necessary again to repeat that the bulletins do not refer to a prediction but to a prophecy, that reveals the mentioned dates. Prophecies are always changeable, for they do not rest upon something that forces prophecies to be fulfilled, contrary to predictions that fulfil themselves with absolute certainty. Prophecies rest upon logical and consistent thought processes, that out of certain causes again will develop certain effects, in fact according to actions developed out of causes, the effect will be the result. Therefore, a prophecy represents nothing else than effects that could develop out of certain causes. Each cause can be created in such a way, that from it develops either positive or negative. When a prophecy is made, the significance of its representation is that the effect will be shown which will arise out of a negative cause, if not at once will be acted in different or positive way because as a rule, the negative will be laid out to the human being that he/she develops out of causes. This therefore, that the human being will think about the evil he/she is just about to create. Therefore, the consequences i.e., the negative effects of his/ her actions will be pointed out in a prophetic manner, so that the human being can begin to act reasonably and avoid evil consequences, i.e. negative effects and make something good and positive out of his thoughts, feelings and actions. Therefore, it depends on human beings themselves if a prophecy does fulfil itself or not. That is true in respect to a Third World War, for the prophecies do not say that a Third World War will be unavoidable, but refer to the possibility of such a war if human beings will not change and stop their political and war-like and religious insane behaviour and do not make a beginning to change toward the positive in all areas. So it is solely up to human beings themselves if the prophecy fulfils itself or not. And that is correct in the case of the Third World War which in fact does not have to happen if human beings finally will be reasonable and bring the powerful and mighty to their senses, who are in fact all those stupid, power-hungry, greedy for profit, self-complacent, greedy, hateful, idiotic, and are crazy enough to launch wars and incite those of the people who are stupid and idiotic and will scream pro and hurray and take up arms to kill innocent human beings. Contrary to prophecies, predictions are unavoidable happenings and will be in some way predicted by clairvoyance through visions or through a glance into the future. They are true, unstoppable and unchangeable and cannot be avoided. Neither in recent times nor in times past has a prediction been given for a Third World War, only prophecies exist in this respect that do not have to fulfil themselves as everybody knows, if human beings act reasonably against these and do not let a threat become reality. Therefore, in respect of a Third World Fire, it depends entirely on the reason, behaviour and action of the human being, if he/she will let the prophecy become reality or not. | ||
Ed209 New member Post Number: 4 Registered: 09-2006 |
Quote taken from Phi_Spiral off of the movies and videotapes thread: "all evil forces will have to change their ways if they want to survive" I take it that this means that a third world war after 2029 is very unlikely or is it perhaps even impossible? Regards Ed | ||
Likeaflower New member Post Number: 4 Registered: 07-2007 |
Hello Ed, A Third World War is only unavoidable if the war-mongers and power-hungry stop making war and acting against Creation's Laws and Bids!  If we do not make the necessary changes, then the prophecy will fulfill itself, whether this is at 2029, or at an earlier or later date/s. As the people of Earth we have a responsibility to avoid this terrible prophecy from fulfilling itself if we finally stop giving support to, or voting criminals and other unrighteous ones into Government positions of power. To quote Rarena's post above: "...Therefore, it depends on human beings themselves if a prophecy does fulfil itself or not. That is true in respect to a Third World War, for the prophecies do not say that a Third World War will be unavoidable, but refer to the possibility of such a war if human beings will not change and stop their political and war-like and religious insane behaviour and do not make a beginning to change toward the positive in all areas. So it is solely up to human beings themselves if the prophecy fulfils itself or not. And that is correct in the case of the Third World War which in fact does not have to happen if human beings finally will be reasonable and bring the powerful and mighty to their senses, who are in fact all those stupid, power-hungry, greedy for profit, self-complacent, greedy, hateful, idiotic, and are crazy enough to launch wars and incite those of the people who are stupid and idiotic and will scream pro and hurray and take up arms to kill innocent human beings." Salome, Anthea C. Overpopulation Threat Blog | ||
Phi_spiral Member Post Number: 95 Registered: 03-2007 |
Hi Ed, My interpretation is that, yes, if WW3 hasn’t happened by then, it will be extremely unlikely to happen at all. For some time now the writings coming out of FIGU have indicated that the policies of the Bush administration (and Bush himself) have been the biggest threat to catalyzing a world war. So once he is out of office, the threat level drops significantly. But behind Bush are the power brokers of the CIA/secret government. Their machinations will linger and fester still longer as will the mad fervor of religious extremists. And therefore, Billy has indicated that the next potential period for a world war outbreak will be 2010 through 2011. The Peace Meditation presented by the Plejarens is intended to help us mitigate war-type energies during this critical transitional time period we are living in right now. I suspect they were largely responsible for the Democratic victory in the November, 2006, US elections. And Billy has said that the world at large is awakening to the imperialist threat of US foreign policy as characterized by a recent speech made by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Regards Bob | ||
Cpl Member Post Number: 280 Registered: 08-2004 |
I think if you read all Billy has to say on the future and this century you will find that mankind may need to be vigilant far into the 21st century in order to avoid all possibility of a third world war. It does, however, pay to concentrate on the present times, because now is where and when the future is being born. cpl | ||
Hector Member Post Number: 292 Registered: 04-2006 |
Do not forget that overpopulation and wars are tied together.If mankind does not reduce their numbers, we are heading into disaster no matter what. The earth's resources are finite, and the powerful wormongers wish to control them.Todays irak war is due to oil, next wars will be due to water or draught, and lack of food. Why does an american consume 20 times more petrol than an iraqi? Consumption and resources must be leveled and balanced before we can avoid future wars. |
