Topics Topics Edit Profile Profile Help/Instructions Help   FIGU-Website FIGU-Website
Search Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View FIGU-Shop FIGU-Shop

Archive through April 03, 2010

Discussionboard of FIGU » The Mission » The Pleiadians/Plejarens and the Federation » Plejaren Antigravity Technology » Archive through April 03, 2010 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Gordonb
New member

Post Number: 1
Registered: 12-2008
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2008 - 10:38 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi everyone,

Ok i have watched the YouTube video on Mr John Searl's SEC machine:-

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8635897559220353909&q=searl&pl=true

Very interesting indeed, but I was wondering what Mr Meier or Mr Horn's view was about this project, and about Mr John Searl?

Salom.

GordonB
UK.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

J_rod7
Member

Post Number: 533
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2008 - 03:44 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

*
***
Hello Gordon,

I must say, very interesting discussion of professor Searl's inventions. The physics seems to actually be viable in the application, for both propulsion and for power generation.

The video at the Google site is dated 1994. Do you know if anything more recent is available?
What is professor Searl doing NOW?

For your interest, after following some links from the Google video, I found this link packed with news stories about anti-grav, Zero-point power, inventors, and resources...: http://www.zpenergy.com/

May I suggest for you to post your question for Billy to answer directly. You must wait for the section at the first link to open (about the 3rd week in January '09). Or you may post your question in the link at the second section for 'Peer Review' - which will be passed along to Billy.

http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/1871.html?1227493503 -(Direct to Billy, when opened)

http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/9502.html?1230060162 -(For Peer review, then submitted to Billy)

Welcome to the FIGU Forums, Good to see you on board.

Salome
***
*
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Gordonb
New member

Post Number: 2
Registered: 12-2008
Posted on Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - 01:43 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks J_Rod for your info. I will post this for Mr Meier (when he's well enough).

Gordon.
UK
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

J_rod7
Member

Post Number: 1028
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 - 05:16 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

*****

Best Greetings All,

A very interesting video which discusses the BeamShip propulsion technology. This incorporates analysis from the CIA. ...:

http://www.exopolitics.org.uk/beamship-drive-technology/

Salome

*****

TRUTH finds WISDOM finds LOVE finds PEACE

Find What You Seek ~ Rod
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Getknowledge
Member

Post Number: 54
Registered: 04-2008
Posted on Friday, October 02, 2009 - 07:57 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Very convincing video of a ufo diving into the ocean avoiding jets and helicopter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDV4rNdfNdA
Tien
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Michael_horn
Member

Post Number: 47
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 - 03:52 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A few things make it suspicious. One is the splash and of course why did it go into the water instead of just go immediately vertical (or in any direction that the jets and helicopter couldn't easily negotiate)? And why so much filming of the floor of the boat?

I'm not exactly buying this one.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Davidmg
Member

Post Number: 15
Registered: 03-2008
Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 - 06:12 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

well, for me I am not convinced that it is real. First of all the two same jets ( if they are the same ) seems to turn and go the opposite direction in what appears to be a very short time period in order to again start chasing the UFO. Secondly, ask yourself this, why does an advanced form of technology need the protection by means of water in order escape from our inferior form of flight. And I am sure most space craft would never allow jets to get that close.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Jgarbush
New member

Post Number: 1
Registered: 09-2009
Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 - 09:14 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Why is it whenever someone films a UFO that they can't just hold the camera in one place? Great video.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Marksmanr
Member

Post Number: 125
Registered: 02-2008
Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 - 09:40 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Davidmg raises good points and also to me that UFO video looks like it was edited with Adobe After Effects.
Reece Stiller
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 31
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 - 10:52 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

In regards to the reason why the UFO went in the water. If the UFO is real it could be doing that to play around with the military and show off about what they can do and what we can't.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Getknowledge
Member

Post Number: 55
Registered: 04-2008
Posted on Sunday, October 04, 2009 - 02:34 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

i found the same video with better quality.

In this one 2 other jets can be seen approaching just before the camera turns to the UFO making a total of 4 jets. And a piece splitting from the UFO then going another direction just before the drop, and the splash is more defined.

Well if i had the capability, diving into the water is one simple solution because they can't follow.

Maybe the fisherman was avoiding the helicopter from seeing him film as it approached?

This would be an expensive scene and expertly done. Because they are in middle of the ocean, and everything was on que with the reaction and timing, all in one continuous shot in real-time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP4Q_4KtxBM&feature=channel_page
Tien
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Hector
Member

Post Number: 514
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Sunday, October 04, 2009 - 03:51 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

According to the plejaren, at the moment, there are three types/kinds of space travelling visitors observing and monitoring this planet.

I guess that ufo could belong to one of them. If the UFO in the video makes use of some "progressive" protective shield, (the plejaren use it) the ocupants in the craft will never experience pressure, or acceleration problems on board.....With progressive shield i mean if the craft moves towards some rigid, hard object, the faster the UFO moves, the stronger it pushes/diverges the object in front of it....

I think that video is quite interesting and could be definitely authentic.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 32
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Sunday, October 04, 2009 - 02:31 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Its much harder to insert anything in a moving picture. If it was hoax, was the army in on it too? The suspicious offset splash may have something to do with its shielding device. Tien raised a good point too about it all being filmed in one continuous shot in real-time. I think its real.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 33
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Sunday, October 04, 2009 - 08:10 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You also can't say that UFO was edited in after those 2 flyby's and chopper rant because the fishermen pointed directly to the spot where the UFO was hovering and said something along the lines of "what the .... is that!"
So to say it was a hoax using Adobes photo shop doesn't sit right for me. I think theres too much going on in that minute video for it to be a fake.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

C_andre
Member

Post Number: 5
Registered: 01-2009
Posted on Tuesday, October 06, 2009 - 09:34 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I also thought that was real but it´s from a spanish film, see there
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_ua_bMx7jI

http://noticias.terra.es/especiales/mundo-insolito/actualidad/ovni-gallego-making.aspx
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 37
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Tuesday, October 06, 2009 - 04:50 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't know Spanish but I don't get it? If it was a clip from a film then why were the fishermens faces as well as the boats name blocked out??
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Hector
Member

Post Number: 516
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Wednesday, October 07, 2009 - 08:43 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Darren the video is fake...It was used as "viral advertising" of a web hosting company called Terra. They say they wanted to pay homage to Orson Welles but of course this aint true. Terra just pursued a good marketing campaign, and sadly, they were successful. The thing is they have fooled a lot of people.

Here you can watch the "making of" that UFO vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmxsZbssmDE
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Darren
Member

Post Number: 38
Registered: 07-2009
Posted on Wednesday, October 07, 2009 - 02:12 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good UFO clip! So no-one here was right or wrong because it was a clip from a FILM. I was closest though :-) - "If it was hoax, was the army in on it too?"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Smukhuti
Member

Post Number: 83
Registered: 06-2009
Posted on Sunday, November 08, 2009 - 07:31 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

U.S. designed flying discs to bomb Soviet Union
http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/usaf-3118
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Edward
Member

Post Number: 1527
Registered: 05-2002
Posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 05:19 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Smukhuti....


Am familiar with it. It is - out of date -, by now!

I think the US would even utilize - Drones - these days; which can fly below
the radar senses. And than, just fire a nuclear head, with ease. And as you
may know: Drones can be piloted remotely. No need for pilots.


Edward.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Earthling
Member

Post Number: 327
Registered: 05-2008
Posted on Saturday, December 05, 2009 - 02:14 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9F3i__dHNQ&feature=player_embedded

Excerpt from the first introductory part of the documentary UFOs Greatest Story Ever Denied.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Gaiaguysnet
Member

Post Number: 918
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Monday, February 08, 2010 - 03:55 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dear fellow tech-heads, nerds, geeks, scientists, intelligent laypeople etc.!

 "It only takes one single white crow to prove that not all crows are black." Tom Bearden

Research in a Vacuum: DARPA Tries to Tap Elusive Casimir Effect for Breakthrough Technology
October 12, 2009, Scientific American

"Success in harnessing this force could someday help researchers develop ... levitating objects that defy gravity."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=darpa-casimir-effect-research

Also worth knowing:

http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/100608.htm

"So here we have the very clear and rigorous scientific proof that one can indeed extract free and usable EM [electromagnetic] energy from the vacuum, accomplished in a great national laboratory. It has also been replicated independently in a second great laboratory."


Won't be long now!

Cheers!
Dyson
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Smukhuti
Member

Post Number: 298
Registered: 06-2009
Posted on Saturday, April 03, 2010 - 09:46 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Regarding applications various theories in disc type craft, Bowfield-Brown effect is one of many I’m intrigued with. It might be possible that some earth governments have perfected this or some other tecnology for application in disc shaped craft, but conventional scientists are starting to make breakthroughs in this fields.

Bowfield-Brown effect: Basically, when a high voltage is applied to a capacitor* with electrodes of different dimension, the capacitor experiences a net force towards the smaller electrode. The more efficient of this set up is when the smaller electrode is positive.

Even though the cause for this is not firmly established, so far ionic wind has been widely recognised as the cause behind this behaviour. There are areas which baffles current scientific community like how this force also works in vacuum.

I recently dug out a paper written by Bahder & Fazi from the internet who claimed to reproduce the effect in a 5gram “lifter” set up by passing 1.5mA current and maintaining 30KV between electrodes. By trial and error, they designed a configuration that drew 30KV @ 500mA, and showed substantially improved results with rapid lifting. They inferred:
1. The net force worked always towards the smaller plate irrespective of orientation w.r.t. earth surface i.e. the effect has nothing to do with earth’s gravitational field.
2. The effect has nothing to do with anti-gravity.
3. The effect was not accounted by ionic wind model of explanation as the experiment produced several 1000 times more force than predicted by the model.
4. The effect was not fully understood by ionic drift (due to collision between ions) either.

5g seem to be miniscule, but thats how theories are first put to practice.

*To be very short - A pair of conductor separated by an insulator also known in the context as dielectric
Salome.
Suv

Administration Administration Log Out Log Out   Previous Page Previous Page Next Page Next Page