| Author |
Message |
   
J_rod7
Member
Post Number: 652
Registered: 10-2007
| | Posted on Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 11:20 am: | 
|
*******
"Huge gamma-ray blast spotted 12.2 bln light-years from earth"
News story from: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090219/sc_afp/sciencespaceastronomy
"Thu Feb 19, 3:58 pm"
[ "WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US space agency's Fermi telescope has detected a massive explosion in space which scientists say is the biggest gamma-ray burst ever detected, a report published Thursday in Science Express said. The spectacular blast, which occurred in September in the Carina constellation, produced energies ranging from 3,000 to more than five billion times that of visible light, astrophysicists said.
[ "Visible light has an energy range of between two and three electron volts and these were in the millions to billions of electron volts," astrophysicist Frank Reddy of US space agency NASA told AFP." ]
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
An explosion of that magnitude is most likely produced by the Collapsar event of a HYPERNOVA STAR. HyperNovas result from HyperMassive single Stars which are in the range of 120 to 160 Solar Mass. Such stars are also 'First-Generation' stars within young, newly forming Galaxies. (Remember, we are also looking backwards in Time 12.2-Billion years). When such HyperMassive Stars collapse, they instantly form a "Black Hole" with all the equivalent mass of 120 to 160 Suns all converted to Pure Energy (Energy equal to the Mass times the speed of Light squared, E=MC^2, a truly HUGE amount of energy).
SuperNova Stars, which are more common, are generally in the range of 10 to 30 Solar Masses. SuperMassive Collapsars also instantly form "Black Holes."
Our Sun (equal = 1-Solar Mass) is a 'Third-Generation' Star, since it has accumulated all the elements higher than Iron (on the periodic chart) within itself, which were produced in the explosions of 'ordinary' Nova Stars - having less than 3-Solar Mass, and distributed throughout it's collected planets (Terra, Mars, Pluto, Malona, &c). First Generation Stars, on the other hand, accumulate only from coalescing huge cloud-masses of Hydrogen with some Helium, and with no heavier elements, when they ignite by Fusion into the Star. With no heavy elements to begin with, is the reason such Stars can grow so large. We don't see such HyperMassive Stars in our neighborhood, as these are in the first evolution phase of young Galaxies.
When ANY Star collapses into a "Black Hole," all of the Stars' Angular Momentum is converted into Spin. Then all the Energy inside the Event Horizon is now spinning at a very high 'velocity' which, like a monstrous Electro-Magnetic Generator, Polarizes the "Hole" (creates a pair of poles) which focuses Energy from the Accretion Disk, where the remaining mass of the Star from it's outer 'shell layers' is still being converted into Energy.
"Black Holes" with Jets are in the 'Feeding' stage. Ours, at the Core of our Galaxy, is currently in a 'Quiescent Mode.' (But there are signs that it may begin soon to feed again.)
These Focused beams include extremely Energetic Gamma, and also lesser energetic Energy down through X-Ray bands, Visual Light bands, and all down into the Radio-Frequency bands - all this in a continuous spectrum. It is ONLY when the Polarization Axis is pointed directly in our direction, are we able to "see" them. Like having the barrel of the Canon pointed at us. "Black Holes" and their Galaxies are oriented in every possible direction. Therefore, for each one that we do see, there are hundreds of thousands more which we can't see (Ratio less than 1/100,000), but they ARE there too.
Salome
*******
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
|
J_rod7
Member
Post Number: 686
Registered: 10-2007
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 04, 2009 - 03:58 pm: |
|
*******
To the Interest of All,
Clean FREE Energy generation is become more feasible. The Orion Project, directed by Dr. Steven Greer, has assembled a team of professional Engineers, Scientists, and Inventive geniuses to harness the "Zero-Point Energy" field in practical applications.
The "Summary of Breakthrough Energy Technologies" is found at this address (sorry, not 'active' links, do a Copy & Paste to a new browser page):
[ http://www.theorionproject.org/Energy.pdf ]
This Summary is the Memorandum Paper of the Orion Project which is being presented to President Obama and to Congress.
This results from a collaboration of the Dr. Greer group at [ http://www.TheOrionProject.org ] with the group - Advanced Energy Research Organization, [ http://www.AERO2012.com ]
Power On, Dr. Greer
*******
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
|
Ramirez
Member
Post Number: 50
Registered: 06-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, March 05, 2009 - 08:19 am: |
|
Greetings Rod.
Haven't been to the disclosure site for some time. Thanks for the bump.
A magnificent effort by Dr Greer and his team who have presented the information impeccably. This is the point of no return.
Once it surfaces on President Obama's desk we will soon know by his response what the future holds and what Obama really intends to do with his opportunity.
Dr Greer was wise to wait for Bush's departure.
Hey, just noticed the section we are in. "Discussions on plants and nature on earth."
Is that Scott with ruler in hand I see coming towards us 
Well it's loosely related to plants & nature which will benefit should positive changes begin to manifest as a result of Dr Greer's team effort.
Cheers.
|
J_rod7
Member
Post Number: 690
Registered: 10-2007
| | Posted on Thursday, March 05, 2009 - 01:15 pm: |
|
***
Hi Ramirez,
Well if clean, non-polluting energy does become available, we all will certainly be saving the Natural World, together with all the Flora and Fauna which lives here with us. 
Right-on about Bush. THAT bunch was right in bed with the OIL. 
Salome
***
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
|
Creational
Member
Post Number: 217
Registered: 09-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, March 05, 2009 - 09:30 pm: |
|
Dear Rod,
Thank you for the great information as usual.
Salome
Zhila,
Thank you Billy.
|
Scott
Moderator
Post Number: 1724
Registered: 12-1999
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 03:05 am: |
|
Hello,
Now I don't know for sure if this is a sign of degeneration as a result of overpopulation, or an un-natural expression of false humanity, but I have seen an increase in peoples fascination with animals such as dogs and cats, and the over protection of them to the point that they are treated more humanely than people. People carry around small dogs in purses like they are children. They are treated with special diets and groomed with special shampoos and if the animal is acting "out of character" they are taken to the pet psychologist to be diagnosed. The internet seems to have grown in proliferation of images of animals cuddling each other, sleeping together and grooming each other etc...I think some of these images are created with imaging software, but never the less; people continue to pass these images around of animals of different species eating from the same bowl and intertwined in loving embraces while lounging on grandmas favorite pillows etc...It seems the natural wildness of animals is being bred out of them, and they have become these small pampered creatures destined to lead the life of luxury……I am not advocating not being kind to animals, but there seems to be something out of balance here, where animals are somehow a replacement for human love? |
Ramirez
Member
Post Number: 80
Registered: 06-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 03:54 am: |
|
Scott.
Pets are often more affectionate & reliable than people with the added attraction of being far less complicated.
I live alone in a very peacefull quiet neigbourhood.
Some years ago 2 stray cats wandered in and have pretty much taken up residence though they remain outside.
The old grey male comes into the house only occasionally, the ginger female hardly ever.
Though being essentially wild these two have unique personalities in that they have never harmed any other creature in the yard including about 20 species of birds which visit daily or garden lizards which are darting about everywhere.
It's quite a sight observing many varieties of birds eat bread sometimes within about a meter of the cats who occasionally watch though generally pay no attention to them.
The birds occasionally squabble amongst themselves even when there's plenty of bread tossed out for everyone, the worst behaved being Indian Mynah birds who seem to spend more time trying to keep other species away than eating themselves.
Being able to observe & interact with these creatures is a gift from the creator .... if only humans could get along so well together
Cheers.
|
Edward
Member
Post Number: 1364
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 04:52 am: |
|
Hi Scott....
I have noticed the same as you have.
People are indeed 'exaggerating' what they do with their so-called PETS!
I have neighbors and you can not even say anything about their dog when it
'potty or relieves' itself, in or around the build I live! Their pet, is
'Holy', so to speak. [And in cases, they give the blame of their 'animal
dumping' on foreigners, even! I have witnessed 2-3 times this face-to-face,
and the owner does not even clean up!]
Well, I would agree with what the Plejarans have said: that ALL animal life
forms(pets in general) to be left in their own habitat! Also due, to the
number of deceases they generated which are not healthy for the human being.
They are indeed, taking AWAY....the Natural 'Instinct' mechanism from these
animals. And trying to convert them into human being-like creatures, which is
very 'False and Foul'! As Billy mentioned, that these pets be kept out of the
home living environment. And which I fully agree with; am allergic for most
animals, anyways....
It has been proven that such above mentioned animals practically never survive
when they are left on their own, out in the streets! They have been pampered
too long, and are not 'self depended' anymore. And this is all due to the
fault of the owners! The animal(s) should still keep their Natural Senses, of
being a Predator-like creature, if they loose this: than...they are Doomed!
Me too, Scott: I love animals....but we should let them live in their OWN
NATURAL environment and NOT in our household. [I have known individuals whom
treated their pets, just as you mentioned. Even making their pet into: Their
BABY!]
They can just not make correct 'distinction' anymore. They are indeed -
Confused -!
"Let the animal BE an Animal....and let the human BE a Human....."
Edward. |
J_rod7
Member
Post Number: 741
Registered: 10-2007
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 02:37 pm: |
|
***
Hi Scott and All,
There is a Black & White Tomcat which adopted us some four years ago. He comes and goes at his pleasure, lets us know when he's hungry and when he wants affection. When he first came, he was scrawny, skinny and tired. We take him to the Vet once per year for shots and check-up. He's now healthy (18-lbs) and happy. Occasionally, he stays out all night, for which my wife gets worried, but is back again the next day. He keeps mice and other rodents far away from our house, and earns his keep.
What is sad to me, is that our neighbor has three cats, from which they have been de-clawed. Those poor creatures can never go outside of their house, as they now are defensive-less, and would become prey for other creatures. I think to de-claw any animal like that is 'cruel and unusual' which they do for the 'sake of their furniture.' They are indulged in every other way, and there is no 'wildness' left in them.
I think such use of animals - to pamper them like children - is another sign of sickness in the Human population.
If Earth were not so overpopulated, there would be room for all such creatures to be at one in the natural environment as on Erra.
Salome
***
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
|
Creational
Member
Post Number: 269
Registered: 09-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 05:21 pm: |
|
Dear Scott,
I totally agree with your post regarding pets. Here is an interesting article saying what Billy has been saying all along.
http://www.aolhealth.com/healthy-living/pet-making-you-sick?icid=main|main|dl3|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolhealth.com%2Fhealthy-living%2Fpet-making-you-sick
Salome,
Zhila,
Thank you Billy.
|
Marksmanr
Member
Post Number: 80
Registered: 02-2008
| | Posted on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 - 10:34 pm: |
|
I've luckily never had a pet and I never will have one. And yes I agree that people are too obsessed with pets, all my relatives and friends have pets, and a quarter of the people I see walk down my street are walking a dog. I find it annoying when I go to my friends house and their puppy or dog jumps on me and licks me etc. I am not a pet man.
So why do so many people have pets and why are they getting more popular? My guess is how society is, degeneration of people's consciousness due to overpopulation, and lack of spiritual development to know that it is illogical and wrong and dangerous as pets don't have a human consciousness thus can never behave like human beings, are supposed to be naturally free in the wild, and carry diseases. Sure you could think animals are "cute", but going far enough to have a pet then further developing an obsession seems to also be due to degeneration.
Human beings are the most beautiful creations, and we're so nice, peaceful and intelligent... we should enjoy our own company and love each other more!
Reece Stiller
|
Markcampbell
Member
Post Number: 145
Registered: 10-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 - 12:11 pm: |
|
It may be like Obama said " if you want a friend in Washington , get a dog " .
My view is that humans no longer can trust most other humans , outside of their own particular kind .
Which gets more particular as time goes on . |
Earthling
Member
Post Number: 226
Registered: 05-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 - 04:44 pm: |
|
Since this topic has turned into Pets Anonymous .. I will chime in;
My sis gave her daughter a puppy she always wanted, for her 10th birthday. She asked me if I wanted one of the litter, as well. I said "no way!, no thank you!". Naturally, my sister ended up caring for the little critter. To give her a break I told her I'd take her for a few weeks. Then she went back home for a couple months. Then I got her again for a few weeks ... and so on and so forth.
Long story short .. the pup has ended up in my care. She is a fine and fun doggy. Not that I would get another one but I am definitely enjoying her.
Hasn't Billy said one can learn from nature? |
J_rod7
Member
Post Number: 770
Registered: 10-2007
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 - 11:44 pm: |
|
*****
Astronomers may not have observed the fabled "Stairway to Heaven," but they have photographed something almost as intriguing: ladder-like structures surrounding a dying star. A new image, taken with NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, reveals startling new details of one of the most unusual nebulae known in our Milky Way. Cataloged as HD 44179, this nebula is more commonly called the "Red Rectangle" because of its unique shape and color as seen with ground-based telescopes. 5/11/2004.
This Star really looks like this, no optical illusion...
Like a giant Ruby, floating there in Space
*****
You say you want an Evolution, well you know, we're all doing what we can. -(Beatles revamped)
Rod
|
Stephen_moore
Member
Post Number: 94
Registered: 01-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, May 31, 2009 - 05:47 am: |
|
Excerpt from "Contact Report 249"
Ptaah
....... For decades now he has been under the steady, greatly enhanced influence of artificial electro-magnetic waves, or rather oscillations, which greatly exceed the normal, planet-related measurements and are generated by Man's own thoughtlessness. As a consequence, he is now, and has been for some time, incapable of applying and relying on his magnetic sense. Hence, he can no longer recognize, grasp and perceive many items and events in nature in the manner that animals are able to, although their magnetic sense is increasingly harmed also through the irresponsibility of mankind on Earth. Birds and animals, for instance, are guided by their magnetic sense during their annual migrations or flights from one region to another when they frequently traverse many thousands of kilometers. The longer they are exposed to this electromagnetism, the more the magnetic sense of orientation of these migratory animals and birds is upset and causes their death for many of them. Whales, for instance, lose their orientation and become stranded somewhere on river banks or in the rivers, where they die a terrible death; a situation that is increasingly becoming more common even for other aquatic wildlife forms. With increasing frequency, herds of many wild animals are losing their sense of orientation because their magnetic sense is upset. This causes them to flee and plunge, panic-stricken, over cliffs and crevasses to their death, etc. Thunderstorms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, as well as other great calamities of nature's elements also produce increased magnetic waves or oscillations. Animals and birds sense these increased electro-magnetic oscillations and behave accordingly. They flee or seek sanctuary elsewhere.
55 whales die after mass beaching in South Africa
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20090531/tts-uk-safrica-whales-e892cc9.html
My Website - www.ufofacts.co.uk
|
Matthew_justin_deagle
Member
Post Number: 46
Registered: 05-2009
| | Posted on Saturday, June 06, 2009 - 08:59 pm: |
|
Scott,
You are intirely correct, and in fact there are admonitions against such persons as treat animals like that in OM itself. Such is purely degenerate and un-understanding, stemming from a hostility to humans combined with a fundamental non-sense about animals, that refuses to acknowledge the instinctual nature of their human-mind-imitating & self-preservative behaviour.
Salome,
- Matthew |
Joseph_emmanuel
Member
Post Number: 112
Registered: 05-2004
| | Posted on Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 12:02 pm: |
|
A question regarding the origins of the Earth, in particular its oceans.
Does anyone know if Billy has said anything on how the Earth got its oceans, whether it was through major rainfalls in the early stages of the Earth's evolution, whether it was a gradual build up of water over billions of years, or whether the oceans were delivered by a swarm of comets carrying vast quantities of ice?
I've tried doing a search on this but have been unsuccessful. If there is any written info by Billy that anyone can direct me to, that would be great.
Thanks very much for your help. |
Scott
Moderator
Post Number: 1836
Registered: 12-1999
| | Posted on Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 10:25 pm: |
|
Joseph,
Could it have to do with the cooling of the planet, where the gases over long periods of time solidified (ie: lava) creating the eventual crust, which is cooler than the non solidified areas, which in turn created a contrast in temperatures resulting in steam, and through longer periods of time this steam condensed, creating water....this is just completely a guess....
Scott
(Message edited by scott on August 15, 2009) |
Joseph_emmanuel
Member
Post Number: 113
Registered: 05-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, August 16, 2009 - 12:06 am: |
|
It's a good guess! The one I've decided to settle for, along with major rainfalls after the formation of heavy rain clouds from the condensation of water vapor created by outgassing from volcanic activity and a cooling crust... or something like that.
It amazes me to know that our scientists don't know anything about how the Earth's oceans came to fill the Earth. Even at this stage it is all conjecture, with one of the latest theories being that water was delivered to the Earth by comets carrying ice. But that theory is being debunked by scientific evidence that reveals that our waters have a lower level of deuterium than that found in the ice of Halley's comet (they're presuming that the ice on all comets are the same).
Thanks for playing, anyway, Scott.
Joseph |
Joseph_emmanuel
Member
Post Number: 114
Registered: 05-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, August 16, 2009 - 02:49 am: |
|
In addition to my reply, if I am correct in my observations, hot climates or periods usually produce heavy downpours. This might not be absolutely true, as in the case of a desert. But a desert is barren, allowing for limited plant life and also unable to retain water which might condense; whereas the outgassing from volcanic activity and the cooling of lava together produces water vapor that condenses and precipitates... or something like that.
So going on the theory that hot weather produces heavy downpours, during the volcanic period on Earth, that is, when it has cooled sufficiently, I imagine one deluge after another must have followed. |
Scott
Moderator
Post Number: 1837
Registered: 12-1999
| | Posted on Sunday, August 16, 2009 - 06:23 am: |
|
Here is one explanation: http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/oceans/ocean1.html |
Darren
Member
Post Number: 13
Registered: 07-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, August 16, 2009 - 08:06 pm: |
|
Hi Joseph and Scott,
That question of how Earth's water got here was actually put to Billy not long ago.
Hi Billy,
I was watching a recent scientific documentary on how our planet was formed and the scientists in it really didn't know how our water got here. They said that one of the greatest mysteries in science is how all the water on Earth got here. Can you explain this. Thanks
Actually scientists know about the origin of our water. It was brought to here by comets and through the effects of cold and heat between planet and outer space. And of course chemical processes were also involved.
http://forum.figu.org/cgi-bin/us/discus.cgi?pg=next&topic=12&page=8547 |
Stephen_moore
Member
Post Number: 143
Registered: 01-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 09:01 am: |
|
Hi all
Regarding Lochness "Monster"
Contact Report 230 Part 2
Billy
We spoke once about the Ness Sea, therefore Loch Ness in Scotland, in connection with so-called Nessie, whereby it is supposed to deal with a saurian, for which, however, up until now, no proof of existence could be brought forth.
But you have said that such an animal does actually exist in Loch Ness and that all that, therefore, it is not about a fairy tale.
I would like to see the beast.
Can you take me to it sometime?
Quetzal
109. Actually, two parent animals and a young do exist.
110. It thereby deals with an aquatic predatory saurian, therefore about Plesiosaurus which have sustained themselves for many generations.
111. However, proving their existence will be very difficult, because the animals themselves only seldom make their way into the higher waters, or even to the waters' surface in such a way that they can be sighted.
112. We have observed these distant saurian descendents for many years and have, during the course of our research, also found petrified fossils of their distant predecessors, which we left where we found them where they will perhaps be found some day by terrestrial palaeontologists or other Earth humans.
113. Naturally I will take you there so you can see the animals, however you must not make that public for the next 12 years.
Michael Horn and myself have on our websites info on the Lochness "Monster"
http://www.theyfly.com/The_Loch_Ness_Monsters.htm
http://www.ufofacts.co.cc/Life%20Forms.htm
There is also a video on youtube which possible is a recording on the surface on the Loch. It looks pretty convincing but again also could be fake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWMek50sdyM
Thanks
My new Website address - www.ufofacts.co.cc
|
|
