| Author | Message | ||
    Marbar Member Post Number: 106 Registered: 12-2009 |
A 9 year-old discovered fossil of a new species of human ancestor by accident: http://planetgreen.discovery.com/travel-outdoors/nineyearold-discovers-human-ancestor.html | ||
Smukhuti Member Post Number: 317 Registered: 06-2009 |
Finally found what I was looking for since sometime regarding spirit forms of slimy Ur-humans. Not sure this is already known to all through any previous posts in this forum. http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/periodika/sonder-bulletin/2007/nr-32/leserfragen%3Fpage=0%2C1 Summary: In response to Mariann Mondria's question on how did humans evolved given that humans did not come from ape, Billy explains that the original lineage of ape and humans were same and were enlivened by an impulse energy spirit form like that of plants. These were not like humans or animals, but mucus like undulating creatures that were neither having instinctive consciousness nor conscious consciousness. Only when their brain were somewhat developed that an Ur combination of both instinctive consciousness and consciously evolutionable consciousness developed in them. Of this hybrid spirit form, two new lineages developed – one of humans, for which, from the comprehensive consciousness block resulted a consciously evolutionable consciousness, and another of apes, which maintained the instinct consciousness. Salome. Suv | ||
Markcampbell Member Post Number: 449 Registered: 10-2008 |
the origin of ........... Mucogenics . | ||
Gaiaguysnet Member Post Number: 1133 Registered: 03-2004 |
Hi Suv, We translated that question & answer in full. http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/meier.p6-11,13sb32.htm Cheers! Dyson | ||
Smukhuti Member Post Number: 321 Registered: 06-2009 |
Ohhh, I missed it completely.  Instead spent many hours searching through untranslated German materials and discussing in this forum while your translation was available. Sometime nearest objects are the most overlooked. Salome. Suv | ||
Justsayno Member Post Number: 262 Registered: 10-2009 |
Hi Thomas, I hope this is the appropriate section. I was unaware that Billy said that the Patterson Sasquatch was true. Was that in any contact notes or was it a private conversation that you had? I had heard years ago that the Patterson film was hoaxed and never looked any further into it. Now I see that the film was not a hoax only certain aspects of bringing the film forward were. I have a friend who came across one as a child, it was eating berries and it stank. He got scared and ran. It was later confirmed by others from a native reserve who also spotted it, that report did hit the MSM. Also my brother-in-law who was a truck driver at the time was coming through the mountains and slowed down for a bear crossing the road. Except when it turned to look at him, it didn't have a bear's face. Both happened a good 40 years ago and haven't heard much about them since. "How the hell would you know what my line looks like, it's imaginary." - my Dad, after being told by the police to walk a straight line. | ||
Thomas Member Post Number: 1007 Registered: 03-2004 |
> It was in a contact report but I will try to find it again and tell you > which one. Remind me if I don't get back to you this week because sometimes > I get distracted by several things going on in my personal life :-) | ||
Norm Member Post Number: 1369 Registered: 02-2000 |
I was under impression from reading obviously poorly translated or false info somewhere that Meier said the Patterson Bigfoot footage was a hoax. Even though I always disagreed with Billy on this. I'm glad to hear now that originally Meier said the Patterson film is real. Is there a link to that info? I would like to read it. My Website | ||
Thomas Member Post Number: 1008 Registered: 03-2004 |
> I have searched and searched but am unable to find the exact quote. It is > possible that I am remembering it from the Randy Winters material in which > case it may or may not be true since Winters took a lot of the accurate info > and mixed it with his own. Either way, I was remembering that the Patterson > footage was in fact the actual footage of a female of one of the 7 remaining > Yeti/Sasquatch creatures alive at least at that time. Maybe a question for > BEAM is in order but I will not be asking him myself. If anyone does ask > him though, I recommend asking him specifically if the Patterson video > footage OR ANY OTHER footage is real and not hoaxed. If you ask him a vague > question, you will likely get a similar answer :-) Sorry I was not able to > find it yet but if I do I will post it... | ||
Thomas Member Post Number: 1009 Registered: 03-2004 |
By the way I did a little research online and Roger Patterson never admitted anything of the kind on his deathbed. What he DID admit to was that once he had a guy on stage that claimed to be Bob Gimlin who wasn't. Apparently Roger and Bob had a falling out before that moment and the other guy was a stand in for Bob Gimlin. Granted that doesn't do much for Roger Patterson's credibility but he never said that he hoaxed anything and if the footage was real and he began to exaggerate about it, that may also be just human nature (on Earth at least) for people to try to make things bigger than just the facts (sort of like Randy Winters did). But who knows? Maybe BEAM can clear it up... | ||
Thomas Member Post Number: 1010 Registered: 03-2004 |
Hey Norm where did you hear or read that it was a hoax as far as BEAM was concerned? Maybe that info will help me track down what I was looking for?!? | ||
Marbar Member Post Number: 124 Registered: 12-2009 |
Billy and Semjase talked about how creatures like the abominable snowman is real. Now I'm wandering if the Florida "skunk ape" is real and applies to Billy's and Semjase's conversation: http://www.floridaskunkape.com/ | ||
Norm Member Post Number: 1370 Registered: 02-2000 |
Thomas, From what I remember. I don't think Billy was commenting on the Patterson film specifically but on Bigfoot footage in general. I always believed Pattersons film was real. Plus Bob Grimlin has been making the rounds the last few years stating it was real & he came forward to clear the misinfo that came to light about a 7ft tall guy in a suit. My Website | ||
Justsayno Member Post Number: 263 Registered: 10-2009 |
Hi Thomas, so what you're saying is that you don't know for certain what Billy said? I'm not doubting the existance of Sasquatch only wondering if the film was a hoax. Back to square one. "How the hell would you know what my line looks like, it's imaginary." - my Dad, after being told by the police to walk a straight line. | ||
Tameralc New member Post Number: 1 Registered: 03-2010 |
On the Sasquatch subject some good books for info to consider are Raincoast Sasquatch, 50 Years with Bigfoot and Psychic Sasquatch. The first and the last I thought to be very well researched and quite fascinating. | ||
Thomas Member Post Number: 1012 Registered: 03-2004 |
> Yeah but the info I am talking about specifically mentioned the Patterson > film being a real female of the Yeti creatures. I still need to refind > where I have that info. I have gigabytes of just FIGU related stuff to > rummage through... | ||
Mgilbo1 Member Post Number: 120 Registered: 09-2002 |
Billy did say the patterson film was real and so do most scientists who aren't afraid of getting laughed at by their imbecile piers. I don't think Billy said there are 7 bigfoots left, I think they meant there are 7 types of bigfoot left. There are sightings all over the world and I'm sure if a small fraction are true, there would have to be more than 7. Of course I'm going by memory. I believe billy also mentioned they have a VERY long lifespan. Mark Gilbo | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 1799 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi All.... Just a memory refresher. FIGU-BULLETIN Nr. 11 Volume 3 German printing: August 1997 English publishing: July 1998 YETI SIGHTING IN CHINA During May 1997 the mysterious snow creature Yeti was reportedly seen for the first time in the northern region of China. The 2 m [6'6"] tall being left gigantic footprints and walked with a stride twice the length of a human. Billy and... www.figu.org/ us/ figu/ supporter/ michael_horn/ horn3.htm The Man-Monkey Connection Semjase confirmed Meier's presumption that the Darwinian model of humans descending from monkeys was nonsense. She added that the monkeys were actually the result of a "coupling" between early existing humans (degenerated descendants of earlier extraterrestrials) and another animal. Semjase said that the "intermediate mutations, partly human being/partly monkey," are known to us as "Africanus," "Peking Man" and "Neanderthals." She claimed that, as of 1975, descendants of four different kinds of these mutations existed and are what we call "Yeti." (Seventh Contact February 25,1975 Sentences 117-136) Edward. | ||
Earthling Member Post Number: 453 Registered: 05-2008 |
in the fwiw dept.: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/06/18/1509088/911-calls-released-in-alleged.html "911 calls released in alleged Bigfoot sighting" "He was about 9, 10-foot tall with real long arms. ...It looked like a giant ape with a man's face," Peeler said in a 911 call. "I was afraid to kill it. It made a whimpering sound. I just wanted y'all to know I have not shot one or killed one." Peeler told the 911 operator that the creature had killed one of his dogs." | ||
Bronzedesk Member Post Number: 119 Registered: 01-2009 |
Seems this one was clean there's no mention to the smell emitted by them. They're not known to be very cleanly and only kill in defense! The key here is that our over expansion of lan due to almost over everything is out of control countries are destroying too much and giving them less and less nesting ground! And yes Dorothy, Kansas is still here and they most certainly do exist! Done that been there seen that! First you forget names, then you forget faces. Next you forget to pull your zipper up and finally, you forget to pull it down. George Burns | ||
Ufoman Member Post Number: 15 Registered: 03-2011 |
Does this include teil monkeys, there is a difrerences between monkeies and apes! Great inculde chipmazee and gorillas while monkeys are smaller and ave tails. So are monkeis derived from man! | ||
Smukhuti Member Post Number: 561 Registered: 06-2009 |
Hi Ufoman, What you ask has already been discussed in the previous posts of this thread. Also refer: http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/meier.p6-11,13sb32.htm "Death belongs to life as birth does. The walk is in the raising of the foot as in the laying of it down." - Rabindranath Tagore | ||
Ufoman Member Post Number: 22 Registered: 03-2011 |
Smukhuti, that link did not answer my qesution as I already know great apes, from chipmanzee to nethertal. but are the smaller monkeys with tails and baboons or lemur decented from man? |
