| Author |
Message |
   
Vincent
Member
Post Number: 109
Registered: 06-2013
| | Posted on Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 04:54 pm: | 
|
I also wondered how they put that camera out to perfectly capture Neil Armstrong stepping out onto the moon for the first time. |
Newinitiation
Member
Post Number: 1190
Registered: 07-2005
| | Posted on Sunday, July 13, 2014 - 10:18 am: |
|
Good frigging point Sheila
Do people need to spell it out
Ok here it goes
The story goes that Stanly Kubrick, The eyes wide shut and 2001 director filmed that fake moon landing on Hollywood movie studio
There is even a footage of stage lights crashing down onto the fake moonscape stage.
I've downloaded it years ago and must be somewhere neatly tucked away in my hard drive.
But back to the point and as Billy and the Plejaren have stated the first moon landing was faked and the subsequent 5 moon landings 'DID' take place. |
Kenneth
Member
Post Number: 63
Registered: 04-2013
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 08:52 am: |
|
From a very reliable source that was involved in the investigation of the over budget issues regarding Apollo-11:
Name redacted:
Yeah, I’m sure both astronaut R.G. and, especially NASA Director J.R.T., were “in the know.” The camera “placement” and Armstrong’s jump and step were choreographed in the hanger where the “landing” was filmed. Yep, I’m one of the firm believers who strongly believe there was a hoax. The old Grumman Aerospace hanger’s in Bethpage, Long Island, NY, is where the “event” took place.
Billy:
“The Plejaren’s give/gave no details about the hoaxed photos, but
additional information, like the use of hypnosis on some of the 37
persons who (including the astronauts) were involved in the hoax, and
of course the motives behind this project.” |
Justsayno
Member
Post Number: 631
Registered: 10-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, July 20, 2014 - 08:17 am: |
|
Hi Matt, was this what you were looking for?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of9UQZZQ814
Hi Kenneth, who was J.R.T.?
Good, better, best. May you never rest, until your good is better, and your better best.
|
Kenneth
Member
Post Number: 67
Registered: 04-2013
| | Posted on Sunday, July 20, 2014 - 08:58 pm: |
|
Justsayno,
J.R.T. was one of the people working at very high levels at NASA during the Apollo-11 situation. |
Newinitiation
Member
Post Number: 1216
Registered: 07-2005
| | Posted on Monday, July 21, 2014 - 06:51 am: |
|
Yeah that's the one
Good find Sheila (not the ozzy slang for women)
What a classic hey
The irony of it all especially this statement made over the radio 'are you f******* believing this'
Haha |
Damozart
Member
Post Number: 7
Registered: 06-2015
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 01:20 am: |
|
Billy if the landings on the moon did take place after Apollo 11. Why haven't we been back? My opinion has always been that ancient structures were found so the public was fed fake pictures and film of the landings and smeared,altered lunar orbiter images.
Is the moon grey? A guy name Bill Bryson from Texas gives audiences real close up live video on youtube of the moon taken by his powerful telescope and the colours of the moon are vibrant pinks, greens almost rainbow-like. I can see a rainbow halo hue around the moon sometimes at night when thin clouds pass my view.
Mozart+music=humans are capable of creating such beauty for he world.....lets try. |
Michaelhelfert
Member
Post Number: 553
Registered: 09-2011
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 04:36 am: |
|
Damozart, the rainbow halo seen around the moon at times is a function of light's refractory path as it passes through the atmosphere. There is no reason that the lunar landscape might not exhibit a palette of colors, though. Just an FYI, according to the Plejaren, our moon is actually much older than Earth. It was an interstellar wanderer until caught in Earth's gravity well. Here is a resource for abit of further research:
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Moon_(Earth)
Life
|
Watchdog
Member
Post Number: 50
Registered: 12-2014
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 06:47 am: |
|
Damozart. "Things that make you go Hmmm"
Clouds..... Clouds full of moisture and tiny water droplets. What happens to light when it passes through a prism or water droplets ? You already Know that answer. There are two locations on Earth where we can observe rainbows at night. Victoria Falls in Africa and Cumberland Falls, Kentucky.
That optical distortion was a huge problem for scientist before they invented "Adaptive optics correction for telescopes"
The power of thoughts can come in two forms. Positive and negative. When we're anxious to see, learn, prove or discover something. Our perception can be altered with our minds because of a desire to finally observe what it is we're searching for. Ive done it myself hundreds of times. Just last night I did it. I was outside star gazing. Saw a satellite but all of a sudden the satellite got real bright, then it faded back to its original illumination. For a few seconds my excitement level shot through the roof. OMG a UFO I thought. But very quickly my sensible reasoning kicked in. Wait a minute I thought. Analyzing..... Satellites have solar collectors on them. Just because I can't see the Sun from my location on the Earth surface doesn't mean that satellite's view of the Sun is the same as mine. beep beep - Calculating - Got it. The sun reflected off one of the solar panels for a brief second and shot towards my eyes.
(We can see around corners with a mirror)
This is what the P's were hinting to us about. We are not using our minds properly.
Clear sensible thinking is key to evolving.
Our desire to see something, sometimes alters our preception of whats really there.
David AKA Watchdog. USA
|
Damozart
Member
Post Number: 8
Registered: 06-2015
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 12:14 pm: |
|
Michaelhelfert
Thanks for link. |
Damozart
Member
Post Number: 9
Registered: 06-2015
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 12:17 pm: |
|
Watchdog
And your opinion why we haven't landed a man or woman on the moon since the early 70s is? |
Damozart
Member
Post Number: 10
Registered: 06-2015
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 12:26 pm: |
|
Michaelhelfert
Do the Plejarens know of any other habitable planet that has a ("Moon to cover the Sun nearly precisely during a total solar eclipse, which is quite a special, rare arrangement.")? |
Damozart
Member
Post Number: 11
Registered: 06-2015
| | Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2015 - 12:39 pm: |
|
Watchdog
I have no desire see something that is not there. But rather to know why I see what I see. If I see rabbits in the clouds doesn't imply desire. You ignorantly surmise desire because one's perception is not yours. A shallow elitist retort is way too much reference when you have ignored the first part of my inquiry. Which was......? |
Watchdog
Member
Post Number: 51
Registered: 12-2014
| | Posted on Saturday, June 20, 2015 - 10:19 am: |
|
Damozart.
I feel we're not visiting the moon anymore because we're done with it. Its just a moon. We've seen it and its time to move on. Its just a huge rock.
Everything evolves and along with that is an ever changing journey.
You'll notice the space shuttle isn't around anymore either. We've passed that phase. Its much more economical and safer leaving and returning to earth with the old school rocket, capsule and parachute method. I understand your quest. I did it myself. But sometimes. It is what it is and nothing more so we move on to the next adventure.
David AKA Watchdog. USA
|
Kenneth
Member
Post Number: 150
Registered: 04-2013
| | Posted on Sunday, June 21, 2015 - 08:43 am: |
|
Watchdog,
That is part of the reason for not going to the moon; working in the aerospace industry; there's a lot of information that floats around; some other issues for not returning to the moon are concerns of exposing the fake Moon Landing in 1969.
Kenneth |
Watchdog
Member
Post Number: 52
Registered: 12-2014
| | Posted on Monday, June 22, 2015 - 04:36 am: |
|
Kenneth.
Nasa Covered their butts in that respect. In the contact notes, It's said that NASA placed the evidence on the moon on later missions. They knew the probability of other countries going to the moon was high. How they did that is a mystery to me. You would think the astronauts would question why they were placing items on the moon that should have already been there. My guess is Nasa sent an unmanned mission to the moon and placed the items then, Even if they crashed it there. Its just to damn easy for them to say. "Oh golly. An asteroid must of crashed into it"
The moon is a rock floating in space that is orbiting Earth and nothing more. There is no life there. No little green or grey martians plotting and planning a hostile take over of Earth. No reptilian shape shifters there. No tall whites. No magic star children. Its not artificial. its not hollow. Its just a huge rock in space.
To keep the peace. Please realize those conspiracy theories I just mention are not anything to do with what you posted previously. Iv'e only mentioned them becuase those theories are floating about in cyberspace and many people fall for them.
The moon and what happened on it in 1969 will forever be unknown to everyone except for those who pulled off that disgusting, sick lie.
David AKA Watchdog. USA
|
Scott
Moderator
Post Number: 2550
Registered: 12-1999
| | Posted on Monday, June 22, 2015 - 11:08 am: |
|
Interesting
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russian-official-proposes-international-investigation-into-us-moon-landings/523799.html |
Kenneth
Member
Post Number: 153
Registered: 04-2013
| | Posted on Monday, June 22, 2015 - 12:28 pm: |
|
Scott,
That article is very interesting.
Keep in mind that NASA gets their funding from the U.S. Federal Government. In the 1960’s NASA was given an edict to be the first to the moon or else.
Two of several things happened:
1. NASA did what it needed, to survive and keep funding intact from Uncle Sam.
2. NASA knew that they did not have the technology in place to get to the moon in the timeframe outlined by the U.S. president at that time; that left only one viable option, fake a moon landing until the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Agency got their act together to actually land on the moon.
The camera placement and Armstrong’s jump and step were choreographed in the hanger where the “Landing” was filmed. The old Grumman Aerospace hangers in Bethpage, Long Island, NY is where the “event” took place.
Sincerely
Kenneth |
Historeed
Member
Post Number: 41
Registered: 09-2008
| | Posted on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 - 09:12 am: |
|
What I find somewhat humorous is that Apollo 12 still made it to the moon in December of 1969 - thus fulfilling Kennedy's challenge. The hoax of Apollo 11 was completely unnecessary from that angle.
Matthew Reed
|
Kenneth
Member
Post Number: 154
Registered: 04-2013
| | Posted on Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 06:55 pm: |
|
Historeed,
How do you know that the hoax was completely unnecessary? Do you work in the aerospace industry or for NASA?
July 20, 1969 Apollo 11 landed on the moon was hoaxed; that we know for sure.
November 14, 1969, Apollo 12 landed on the moon; approximately 4 months later. How do you know that this was an actual landing; I don’t see where Billy mentions Apollo 12?
Keep in mind, a four month delta is a big deal in the space industry. The whole purpose of the faked moon landing was to get Russia to back off; which they did.
There are other issues as well; we know why Apollo 11 is off limits to future moon landings; but why would the Apollo 17 site be off-limits on the moon until further notice? We can only speculate on this, and there are many.
Kenneth |
Scott
Moderator
Post Number: 2551
Registered: 12-1999
| | Posted on Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 07:55 pm: |
|
Billy mentions in Michael Horn's movie "As the time Fulfills" that Apollo 13 which was presented as a failed mission due to mechanical problems actually did occur and the U.S. landed on the moon at the location of the supposed Apollo 11 landing site and placed artifacts there to create the impression these were left there during the Apollo 11 landing. This would then create the impression that the U.S. did indeed land there even though in reality that never occurred. This was done to insure that future missions by other countries would conclude the U.S. did land there as we were fooled into believing. |
Bobby
Member
Post Number: 16
Registered: 03-2011
| | Posted on Thursday, June 25, 2015 - 06:49 am: |
|
So how did they get through the radiation belt? |
Historeed
Member
Post Number: 42
Registered: 09-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, June 25, 2015 - 08:32 am: |
|
Kenneth,
I do not work in the space industry. Billy mentioned in the 1958 prophecies (verse 14) that the USA would go to the moon 5 times, so I assumed Apollo 12 made it. Therefore, if the main reason for hoaxing the Apollo 11 moon landing was to ensure the USA made it before the end of the 1960's decade, then Apollo 12 fulfilled that mission...therefore the Apollo 11 hoax was unnecessary. Of course there may have been many reasons for the Apollo 11 hoax about which I have no clue. I was just speculating.
Matthew Reed
|
