Topics Topics Edit Profile Profile Help/Instructions Help   FIGU-Website FIGU-Website
Search Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View FIGU-Shop FIGU-Shop

Archive through December 08, 2020

Discussionboard of FIGU » The Planet Earth » Corona Virus Pandemic » Archive through December 08, 2020 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 17
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 02:05 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Correction required for english translation of CR758 item 12:

"12. Spread of the Corona disease
As we have noted, no official information was given to the population by the leaders and authorities of all countries worldwide at the time of the official outbreak of Corona, and this is also not the case today. Even at the beginning of the year, when the first information was made public by the public media worldwide, no official and educational information was given in an irresponsible manner by governmental authorities about the various forms of risk of infection by the Corona disease.}

The bolded part above should be:

given in a responsible manner
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 18
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 02:23 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Request change to the bolded part of the following phrase in CR758:

"This fact is shown by the mere fact that they do not recognize all the necessities, as in the case of the corona pandemic, because instead of imposing a national, long-term, intentional, long-term lockdown with all the necessary necessities, which has been clarified in all the necessary respects, such a lockdown is only imposed for 2 or 3 weeks, although 2, 3 or 4 months would correspond to the requirement to bring the pandemic to a standstill."

should appear bolded as:

such a lockdown is imposed for an inadequately short period of only 2 or 3 weeks, instead of the required 2, 3 or 4 months to bring the pandemic to a standstill as the coronavirus has an incubation period of up to 3 months.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 19
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 02:25 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Request change to the bolded part of the following phrase in CR758:

"This fact is shown by the mere fact that they do not recognize all the necessities, as in the case of the corona pandemic, because instead of imposing a national, long-term, intentional, long-term lockdown with all the necessary necessities, which has been clarified in all the necessary respects, such a lockdown is only imposed for 2 or 3 weeks, although 2, 3 or 4 months would correspond to the requirement to bring the pandemic to a standstill."

should appear bolded as:

such a lockdown is imposed for an inadequately short period of only 2 or 3 weeks, instead of the required 2, 3 or 4 months to bring the pandemic to a standstill as a coronavirus infection can have an incubation period of up to 3 months before symptoms appear.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Scott
Moderator

Post Number: 3227
Registered: 12-1999
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 03:38 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Norms,

Although I didn't translate this Contact, I will see if I can edit it on the FOM Website.
Thank you
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Scott
Moderator

Post Number: 3228
Registered: 12-1999
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 04:07 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Norms,

Does the German read as you stated in your last two posts of the bolded text?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 20
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 04:16 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Request change to the following passage in CR758:

"This is a natural consequence of the stupidity of the majority of those who are not aware of their responsibility as a state, and who are also incapable of governing, and who only make big, feeble-minded slogans and feel as if they are clever, even though their entire cognitive capacity is below zero."

should be:

state servant or head of state
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 21
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 04:23 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

@Scott

I'm not looking at the original German as I cannot read German.

Only suggesting how it should be for clarity and emphasis especially the part about the incubation period of up to 3 months.

Maybe, you can put that part "as a coronavirus infection can have an incubation period of up to 3 months before symptoms appear" in brackets?

This is the most critical piece of information for this virus that requires repeating at least once in this contact report.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 22
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 04:58 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

@Scott,

Make a request for the associated German passage to be as requested in English:

"such a lockdown is imposed for an inadequately short period of only 2 or 3 weeks, instead of the required 2, 3 or 4 months to bring the pandemic to a standstill" (as a coronavirus infection can have an incubation period of up to 3 months before symptoms appear).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 23
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 05:02 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Request correction to item 13 in CR758:

" It should also be noted that food contaminated with food and contact with contaminated objects etc. can also lead to infection, although these two possibilities are considered to be rare. "

should be:

" It should also be noted that contaminated food and contact with contaminated objects etc. can also lead to infection, although these two possibilities are considered to be rare. "
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 24
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 06:53 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Chris Martenson of peakprosperity.com released a video 3-Dec-2020 on youtube titled "Best Covid Treatment To Date By Far" that claims sufficient data from poorer countries on the successful use of Ivermectin as a prophylaxis and treatment of covid19 based on a study titled "Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19" for [FLCCC Alliance; Version 4; Nov. 19, 2020].

Have the url to the study but will not post as per rules of this site.

The video suggests Ivermectin is at least 90% effective pre-exposure, post-exposure, treats early and late stage Covid, and improves the lives of "long haulers" (those suffering Covid19 infection for months without recovery).

Chris recommends the I-MASK+ protocol that includes the MATH+ protocol for those that have to go to hospital. The I in I-MASK+ protocol stands for Ivermectin.

If have a subscription to peakprosperity.com will also be able to access subscription content containing an article titled "My Personal Strategy For The Coming COVID Vaccine" wherein under section "A Personal Story" Chris mentions taking Ivermectin (Druvet horse paste) twice in the last few months.

In the first instance, back in March 2020 to treat what he describes as "very weird and painful lung sensations (like pleurisy)" and thought he had contracted covid19. He also used doxycycline and extra zinc.

He says, the problem went away in two days and he says "I have yet to have a Covid test so I can’t be sure of anything. All I can say is I’ve never quite felt a lung sensation like that before or since, and I recovered quickly after the Ivermectin experiment."

In the second instance, he contracted shingles in November and after 5 or 6 days of research and severe pain, he thought “well, Ivermectin seems to work against most classes of viruses, and works for late stage Covid, so why not?”

So he took another 600 mg (of paste) dose, slammed more zinc, and one other thing which may or may not have helped (some Arbidol he secured back in February). Within 48 hours he was on the mend. The nasty shingles rash stopped dead in its tracks, never progressed to the pustule stage, and went on the retreat.

Now wondering if there has been any discussion on Ivermectin and the I-MASK+ protocol in unreleased Contact Conversations...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Schantz
Member

Post Number: 212
Registered: 03-2007
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 09:48 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Norm after all these years you've become a German translator? Why have you hidden this knowledge until now? What course did you take to learn German so rapidly?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Scott
Moderator

Post Number: 3229
Registered: 12-1999
Posted on Monday, December 07, 2020 - 11:01 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Schantz,

You might be confusing "Norms" with "Norm" ?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 25
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 12:07 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

@Schantz,

I'm not a German translator. I'm merely reading the English translations and picking out unclear statements or statements that contradict what I think was intended for the statement.

Scott is correct that you are thinking of someone else.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 26
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 12:21 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Request correction to CR754 for the bolded word in the following passage:

"This fact is the reason why the great majority of the earthlings, who believe in God's delusion, are afflicted by all evil in their deepest character being, but who neither perceive nor know this, because from time immemorial and up to now all 'clever people' – be they philosophers, wise men, professors, psychologists, connoisseurs of human nature, psychiatrists or other knowledgeable people etc. – have been able to fathom, clarify and point out these facts. Therefore, until today it has never been shown to the human beings of the Earth what a belief in God's delusion causes in every believer, what is going on in its deepest character and what malicious consequences result from it, which in the first place only bring darkness of consciousness to every believer in God, but in the end all evil, discord, violence, war, murder, manslaughter, annihilation and destruction."

should be:

unable
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 27
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 12:28 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The CR754 correction request for the word "able" to "unable" was determined straight away as I was reading it as being opposite to what was intended.

This was confirmed by pasting the following passage into Google Translate:

"Der genannten Tatsache ist der gesamte grosse Teil der Erdlinge verfallen, der gotteswahngläubig im tiefsten Charakterwesen von allem Bösen befallen ist, jedoch selbst dies weder wahrnimmt noch weiss, weil seit alters her und bis anhin alle ‹Gescheiten› – seien es Philosophen, Weise, Professoren, Psychologen, Menschenkenner, Psychiater oder sonstig Wissende usw. – jemals fähig gewesen wären, diese Fakten zu ergründen, zu klären und aufzuzeigen."

to get the English translation:

"The whole large part of the Earthlings have fallen for this fact, who are delusional in their deepest character being afflicted by all evil, but neither perceive nor know this themselves, because from time immemorial and up to now all “clever ones” - be they philosophers, wise men, professors , Psychologists, people who know people, psychiatrists or other knowledgeable people etc. - would have ever been able to fathom, clarify and point these facts."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Joe
Member

Post Number: 583
Registered: 11-2008
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 01:45 am:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Norm or Norms,

I have made some of the corrections in contact report 758, but not all of them as you have just mentioned because not all of them correspond to what there is in German.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 29
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 12:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

@Joe, thanks.

Another correction request for CR758:

"But this is not done because of a lack of consideration for the economy and the screaming demonstrators etc., so that the epidemic cannot run out and start to spread again after the end of the lockdown. "

The original German part is:

"Das aber wird infolge falscher Rücksicht auf die Wirtschaft und die herumbrüllenden Demonstrationsstänkerer usw. nicht getan, folglich sich die Seuche nicht auslaufen und schon nach Beendigung des Lockdowns wieder neu ausbreiten und neuerlich zu grassieren beginnen kann."

The Google translation is:

"But this is not done due to wrong consideration for the economy and the roaring demonstration boobers, etc., consequently the epidemic does not run its course and can spread again after the end of the lockdown and begin to rage again."

Suggestion:

"But this is not done out of wrong economic concerns and the loud demonstrators etc., so that the epidemic cannot be contained and flares-up after the end of the lockdown. "
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norm
Member

Post Number: 246
Registered: 12-2016
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 12:46 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I knew this would happen. NormS it would be nice if you could please change your name. I would for you if you were here first. Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Msmichelle
Member

Post Number: 748
Registered: 02-2010
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 07:07 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Why is NormS making suggestions when he does not speak German??
MsMichelle (sending peace and love to all)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norm
Member

Post Number: 247
Registered: 12-2016
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 07:44 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

BTW, Info is getting edited and updated on the FOM site all the time. Here is a recent re-translation from FOM.

New version
CR:758 However, as regards the looming emergence of a vaccine against the corona virus, which is supposed to prove to be suitable, non-dangerous and effective, in this context the question arises as to its efficacy, namely whether that efficacy will have to be rated in a positive or negative form, once vaccinations are carried out therewith. But whether or not by the time vaccination is administered with such an insufficiently researched and untested medium, it will be a preparation of effective positive efficacy is to be doubted, same as whether there will be no counterproductive reactions or effects at all.

Old Version
However, as regards the emergence of a vaccine against the corona virus, which should prove to be suitable, safe and effective, the question arises as to its effectiveness, whether this will be positive or negative if it is used for vaccination. However, I doubt whether vaccination with such an insufficiently researched and untested medium will be a preparation of effective positive efficacy, and I also doubt that there will be any counterproductive reactions or effects.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Hugo
Member

Post Number: 963
Registered: 04-2015
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 09:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Norm,

I thought "Norms" was you?

This is only going to be confusing going forward if it stays this way. Best if one person changes username.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Schantz
Member

Post Number: 213
Registered: 03-2007
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 10:08 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe Norms could change to Smron, where his letters are still intact but we can avoid any confusion.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page

Norms
Member

Post Number: 30
Registered: 12-2019
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2020 - 10:10 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

@Norm,

Tried to change username but was not allowed.

Administration Administration Log Out Log Out   Previous Page Previous Page Next Page Next Page