| Author |
Message |
   
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2185
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Sunday, September 11, 2011 - 02:57 am: | 
|
Hi Harvey....
Your: Billy Meier has said that the CIA and the Pentagon has been involved in
some very nasty covert operations....
Now that you mentioned it, I did read of an Iraqi CIA recruit (had training in
Fort Hood, Texas) and he deserted his post and all related due to he did not
agree with WHAT the CIA was conducting: planting IEDs and blaming Al Qaede
and to keep the war going! He went into hiding, and said to other Iraqis to also
desert and make this all known. Thus, possibly, the CIA were Blowing Up...
their OWN forces and others, just to keep this WAR 'artificially' going!
Hence, a boost...for the Weapon Industry!!
[I think, there is also a link at Rense.com...]
Edward. |
Justsayno
Member
Post Number: 402
Registered: 10-2009
| | Posted on Sunday, September 11, 2011 - 08:00 am: |
|
Hi Harvey, I'm sure they didn't keep any of the dust in the same way they didn't investigate underground explosions. When a building is leased, that's just like renting it. The owner of a building has building insurance and the leaseholder insures their own contents, every company in those buildings had their own contents insurance. Why did Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder, profit from the double payout of the destruction of the buildings when he didn't own them?
Funny those pictures of drones look like they are mini jet liners with the little windows painted on the side, which would explain why everyone seemed to see jet liners.
Good, better, best. May you never rest, until your good is better, and your better best.
|
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 59
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Monday, September 12, 2011 - 01:55 pm: |
|
It is easy enough to believe that a large bodied Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon as claimed. That the wreckage left behind, was immediately collected and never seen again - that it was not typical of a large Boeing 757, but was small enough such that men could quickly pick it up and leave with it quickly. That the entry hole was not large enough for a Boeing 757 to enter into and disappear.
That it was a surgical strike at the Pentagon - and not a large Boeing 757 creating mayhem. Eyewitnesses seeing a plane present, put it on a flightpath that have it not crashing at the Pentagon, but missing it. Suggesting that the plane was a decoy - see the Youtube video 9-11 Pentagon Strike - I'll quote the exact title later, which features extensive interviews and recreation of the actual flight path. So, it was either a cruise missile? Drone plane? Small jet? that hit the Pentagon. Because of the extensive damage there - missile sounds more believable. Also it is said, that the strike was on a part of the Pentagon that was recently reinforced, such to withstand such an attack, but had it been on another part/wall, that would have been unreinforced. Now, how peculiar is that?
It is hard to work out what happened at the Twin Towers. For me, it defies belief (and physics) that a Boeing 757 could disappear inside a Twin Tower - that the wings should have sheared off and fall down below - that a huge amount of wreckage should have remained outside the building. And not only did it happen once - but twice! The same unbelievability applies to how the Towers fell. That the Tower that was struck second, fell first (after only an hour on being on fire) - that two 110 storey buildings fell in about 10 seconds, and that they fell straight down. Add to this WTC7, which was not struck by a plane - fell typical of a controlled demolition, straight down. And the billowing dust cloud afterwards, also indicates explosives was present. And you have the EPA not warning everybody, that the dust is toxic to your health. You have government agencies not doing their job at all.
Harvey |
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 60
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - 12:45 am: |
|
Here is the title of the video(s) at Youtube, that I looked at:
"Deconstructing the Pentagon Attack" - this only looks in detail at the flight path of the plane seen at this time. |
Joe
Member
Post Number: 164
Registered: 11-2008
| | Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - 01:12 pm: |
|
Harvey said "Billy Meier has said that the CIA and the Pentagon has been involved in some very nasty covert operations - but why has he not said, they were involved in 9-11?"
Harvey, I think it is important to note that the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks in New York was probably not an inside job. The CIA and also the then president George W. Bush probably knew at the time that there was going to be a terrorist attack in the US but were very reluctant to tackle the problem and this is because after the terrorist attacks they wanted a reason to go to war with Afghanistan and Iraq. As David Icke would put it a "problem ---> reaction ---> solution" which I think turned out to be the case.
Source: http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_Special_Bulletin_030 |
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 61
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Monday, September 12, 2011 - 01:35 pm: |
|
It seems to be the case that the CIA was always present at all wars - especially those wars that escalated into a full blown war - ie. In China, when Japan attacked, Korea, Vietnam, etc etc.
I'm just not convinced that Bin Laden was behind the events of 9-11 - but was simply the patsy, scapecoat used. Because you have the Intelligence agencies playing 'dumb' beforehand, the military non-intervention (Rumsfeld seems to be involved in this) - and lots of peculiarities running throughout 9-11, that should not be there. I am simply not convinced that Boeing 757s crashed into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. The later is particularly easier to dismiss entirely. And with the Twin Towers - were planes other than Boeing 757s' used? eg. That plane in the side view footage looks so very dark (was that because it was in shadow? Or because it was painted black?). There was an engine wreckage that was filmed by those French brothers documentary team - but surely that was far too small to be from a Boeing 757?
I'd just wish the Plejarens - if they can't release the details at this time, then they should give us a time, when the full details become publicly known? The whole 9-11 incident underlies how a modern myth is created and maintained, illustrating how religious myths follow the same pattern. That we get to be told endless repetitions of a false story planted in the public psyche - so that many people end up believing in it.
And those who know how movies are made, and how special effects are carried out - that that kind of deception is central to 9-11.
Harvey |
Kingman
Member
Post Number: 878
Registered: 07-2004
| | Posted on Monday, September 12, 2011 - 11:43 pm: |
|
Sheila, there's plenty of dust left and different elements of thermite, and thermate, have been clearly detected by those who have examined this dust. No one "seemed to see jet liners", the airplanes(civilian passenger airliners) were clearly recorded in dozens of citizens video cameras as they hit the towers. Whether these were the original planes has yet to be discovered.
Earthling,
The one plane that was to supposed to have hit the Pentagon was NOT recorded by citizens, and any tapes that may have recorded this action were completely, and immediately, confiscated by the government. The 'vaporization' of all the people, titanium engines, etc., etc., as well as the rest of the plane that hit the Pentagon, may lead one to 'think' a drone disguised as a jet liner hit this building. Fact-wise, it is physically impossible to force, or direct, a 757 size airplane to decend rapidly, level off of the ground, and then fly along the ground, in any type of stabilized form, and crash into a building(at ground level) at 500+ miles per hour. The force of the wings pressing close to the ground will create an inability to allow the craft to even get close to the buildings(Pentagon) level. It can't be done. Period! Never! All 'supposed' witnesses to this crash were all linked to the military, or it's suppliers (which wouldn't be that abnormal considering they were at or near the Pentgon), giving less credibility to their testimony.
Clearly this is not the case with the Twin Towers. But those planes could easily have been switched out with near duplicates of the described airliners.
Yes Michael, controlled demolition does start from the bottom up. Many reports contained accounts of explosions all around the base of each tower right before each one fell, which gives evidence for controlled demolition. And let's not forget building 7 which was never hit by any plane. Videos clearly expose the structure having its lower structure removed instantaneously and falling within its own 'footprint'.
I have continued my study of the evidence for 911 tragedy and can easily deduce that the official story is not even close to what did happen. Search back to the time period, after 911, on this forum, and read all the posts from then. We had many lively discussions regarding what happened and I think one could reasonably decern that the real terrorists were not people living in an Islamic country, or caves. They could only be people with powerful connections to our military and people with high levels of clearance to our intelligence services. It couldn't happen any other way. Do we really need all the details to know that this disaster was absolutely a false flag 'Pearl Harbor-type' event. Always ask, "Who benefits?". Your answer will show you the guilty ones.
Billy did say the buildings collapsed because the planes hit them. He also said that the planes had explosives onboard. This knowledge is enough to help one to begin scrutinizing the event with suspicious thoughts. For him to elaborate more would be interfering with our evolution of becoming more aware. We need to delve into this event for our ability to begin understanding what our society has become. We don't need to be told our leadership is evil, we need to discover it for ourselves.
a friend in america
Shawn
|
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2194
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - 12:58 am: |
|
Hi Harvey and All....
Just an additonal supplement:
"Mossad/CIA murdered U.S. troops in Iraq"
Back in 2006 a story made its rounds through the internet and the worlds media
that Israel snipers were killing U.S. Troops in Iraq and pinning the blame on
"insurgents" in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter
continued. After a thorough investigation into this older story there is more
than enough evidence to point to the fact that Mossad (with the CIA) is
operating inside Iraq and has been for years.
http://deadlinelive.info/2011/09/09/p2og-mossadcia-murdered-u-s-troops-in-iraq
/
Edward. |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2195
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - 11:52 pm: |
|
Hi Guys....
To add: That the detonation executed by the UniBomber(you know that one/guy)
also came to light that it was not per se the VAN with explosives that created
such immense damage to half the (federal?) building, but the Weapons and
Explosives Catch/Storage room(; which was right next to a children daycare
center, in the building)! [National Geographic, I think it was, made a
reconstruction of this event and aired it.]
Thus, there are Weapons and Explosives stored in federal and other public
buildings without the public knowing, this.
Edward. |
Justsayno
Member
Post Number: 403
Registered: 10-2009
| | Posted on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - 09:01 am: |
|
Yes Shawn but none of that made it into the final NIST report. But what did make it into the final NIST report was that no one could have survived building 7. Right after Barry Jennings and Michael Hess were rescued from building 7 they were interviewed on TV. Later on Michael Hess's story changed and he was never even in building 7. Barry Jennings (you can see his interview on Loose Change) died mysteriously two days prior to the release of the final NIST report and I guess they weren't lying when they said NO ONE survived building 7.
Good, better, best. May you never rest, until your good is better, and your better best.
|
Derrick
Member
Post Number: 75
Registered: 01-2011
| | Posted on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - 11:58 am: |
|
Hello my fine people,
regarding Contact 134 #59
Billy: This information is sufficient. Then still this: Guido asked me whether I knew the reason for the disappearance of the Mayan culture. Do you know anything about that?
Quetzal: Quetzal:
57. One reason was very strong climatic changes, which extended approximately over 230 years.
58. A time during which the Yucatan Peninsula, where the actual Mayan culture was settled, was hit by many droughts, which cost many people's lives or forced them into migration.
59. Another reason was tribal wars and acts of war with foreign Indian tribes.
My question is:
Were the tribal wars solely a direct result of their migration into other tribal domains? or were these tribal wars a common occurrence even before the 230 year period?
Does anyone have anymore info on this?
Salome
Derrick |
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 62
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, September 15, 2011 - 12:14 am: |
|
As regards the Oklahoma City Bombing. There is a video, which should be at Youtube - titled "Oklahoma City Bombing - What Really Happened" - this was made by the local residents who were disgusted about the mass media not carrying the real story of the incident. The locals were outraged, that shortly after the explosion - that government people were more concerned about getting access to and removing the evidence left behind, than of helping those injured. This video makes the point that the truck bomb could not have caused the federal building collapse, but that it set off a larger bigger explosion from within the federal building, of illegally stored C4 explosive there.
The wreckage at the Pentagon, reminds me that this was quickly scooped up government men (note - it was small enough to be picked up manually - therefore was not a large Boeing 757) and whisked away - never to be seen or heard of again. The more you look into the Pentagon strike (see the video "The Pentagon Strike Deconstructed" at Youtube)the more you know it was not a Boeing 757 that struck at the Pentagon.
I would say that it appears to be more of an inside job - because so many government agencies fail to do their job properly - before, during and after 9-11. There are so many signs of this, makig it so obvious that the US government agencies are as corrupt as third world countries. Of course there are genuine patriotric people working in these agencies - but they are not in power or control of them thereof.
A Boeing 757 would not simply disappear inside one of the Twin Towers, as if it was cardboard. And for that to have happened twice - defies belief, laws of physics and so on. The same for the collapse of 110 storey structure, that fell down in just over 10 seconds. Only carefully timed explosives would have brought it down like that. That and the billowing dust cloud tell the story. Also the second Tower struck, collapsed first - how odd is that?
You have two separate incidents of the Twin Towers, who behave exactly the same (but mistimed) - Bin Laden could not have done that at all. All of his other terrorists attacks, were always very small operations in comparison.
When you get more information about who this Atta bloke was, and about the trainee pilots - the cover story falls apart. They were too incompetent to have piloted the planes to their targets. You also have to be careful of 'planted' evidence which is suppose to support the cover story - but may not?
Harvey |
Markcampbell
Member
Post Number: 694
Registered: 10-2008
| | Posted on Thursday, September 15, 2011 - 11:58 am: |
|
So it wasnt only the Spanish invasion that led to their demise . |
Kingman
Member
Post Number: 879
Registered: 07-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, September 15, 2011 - 11:20 pm: |
|
Harvey,
Knowing the Twin Towers type of construction will shed some light on understanding how the two planes were able to penetrate completely into the buildings. There were two important features that created the possibility for this event. First was the verticle support beams that were all located in the very central core of both buildings. No verticle beams were found anywhere near the sides of the structure where it is normally standard to put such a needed aspect of a skyscraper. Second was the style that formed the outside walls of the building. These were just shells held in place with a thin metal frame.Mostly the outer sides were just stone facade. The outer walls did not share any of the load/weight of the building. The floor and central core were engineered to carry all the load with the outer walls not being constucted for strength in holding up the building. Search google for some pictures of this design and you'll see what I'm describing here.
A plane at 350 mph+ would easily break through the perimeter made of a thin vaneer-style cut flatstone.
a friend in america
Shawn
|
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 63
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Friday, September 16, 2011 - 02:44 pm: |
|
I would still be skeptical about the construction of the Twin Towers, that would allow a Boeing 757 to enter the building, without shearing off the wings - the plane would have been torn apart.
What we don't see much of - are the photos, etc that show other views of the Twin Towers after the planes struck (before their collapse) to see the damage present, and also what debris was ahrewn about. There was adequate time for people and reporters, etc to be on the scene with cameras, etc to record this. There were some photos/footage taken, but these are only very briefly shown in the mass media coverage.
I am also very skeptical of the Plejarens claim that the planes carried explosives onboard, and that caused the collapse of the Twin Towers - this explanation, would not cause the same result of a carefully controlled demolition - which is what happened. The same with the collapse of WTC7 - even if the debris from the two planes (was WTC7 in the path of these planes at all?) did massively? damage WTC7 - how could that cause damage, such that it fell exactly like a controlled demolition also?
If the features and characteristics of a 'controlled demolition' are there, it most likely was. Destruction by fire with jet fuel would not cause exactly the same result as a controlled demolition. It is simple cause and effect.
Harvey |
Hendrikus1970
Member
Post Number: 15
Registered: 04-2009
| | Posted on Saturday, September 17, 2011 - 02:03 am: |
|
Hello to everybody,
my name is Erik and if been reading and exploring a lot of beam in the last few years.
I had the feeling this was a treu story from the start.
Please dont ask my why ,but it just felt good and logical.
Now i got a few questions that come back every time.
1- Why do you Paladians keep us in the loop ?
2-why is it that we always need to belief and are we need able to see for ourselfs ?
3-You say we got free will and you cant interfer and that we should al do it ourselfs.
but we al know this is not the case .becouse Mankind have been manipulated and the genes alterd from the begining of times.
so there is no free choice .There Is ONLY Belief
4-
why is it that the mayority have to belief and Only 1 Or a few can see its true ?
5-if you guys ( paladians)gave al this info to jmmanuel,bilie,mohamed and so on and you keep it strictly for the eyes of only them to see.Then its again a religion.
Exactly what your doing now again.
Show yourselfs from the begining in time to everybody.Dont hide.Tell the truth.
If you do this then the Mayority of people would stand behind you guys.
Now your making the same mistakes as always.
And i bet you that what ever happens.this situacion remains until you open up to more people a not to only 1 person and put al the burden and riducule on him alone.
You did this over and over again.
i suggest that you guys start helping BEAM .Somthing that your not doing by hidding and building up secrecy ans secrets al the time.
We dont need more religions please !!
To BEAM i like to say this.
I deeply respect you and know you are one of the best souls on this litle planet.I realy hope that 1 day the secrecy wil be over for you buddy.
Until then take care all .
we are awaiting some hard times again.
Cheers,
Erik |
Michael_horn
Member
Post Number: 449
Registered: 07-2009
| | Posted on Saturday, September 17, 2011 - 07:43 am: |
|
Hi Harvey,
That's what I thought too as I watched the towers come down live on TV.
But it seems that controlled demolition is done from the bottom up, not top down, the way that the towers in fact came down.
I don't know anything about how the buildings may have been prepared so as to come down.
I have thought that it may have been even an unforeseen consequence of the attacks but that may be unlikely. |
Edward
Member
Post Number: 2196
Registered: 05-2002
| | Posted on Sunday, September 18, 2011 - 01:16 am: |
|
Hi Derrick....
I was familiar with your posting, yes.
As I understand, is...that Indians as well as what other groups of people DO
clash with each other and which is just part of our - Natural Barbarism -.
We have to keep in mind, that not only certain Indians idolized DARK Forces,
but this manifestation manifests almost in every population group known; part
of their Evolution: seeking Light or Darkness.
Of course, we here at this board know of - Christos -, which is: the Retual
Sacrifice Offering of Babies and Young Virgins; the origin of today's known
Christianity. Christianity has 'lived up' to the above mention practices for
many a hounders of years...to thousands. Which has always Expanded itself as
far as it could, with it's main goal: to Dominate the World!
I would think it would be Domain related, Harvey. All around the world we have
perceived such practices, thus...it has not changed.
Thus: WARS are quite Common in every population known. Every tribe wants to
keep their domain safe guarded from intruders, or whatever the case may be.
The Animal Kingdom, does such...as even the Sea World as even the Insects,
etc...: Common Denominator!
Edward. |
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 64
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Saturday, September 17, 2011 - 06:15 pm: |
|
The collapse of the Twin Towers, and that of WTC7 - that they collapsed onto their own footprint, is the tell tale sign of a controlled demolition (also the huge billowing dust cloud afterwards). You would not expect this to come from burning jetfuel. Also you have WTC 7 coming down, which only had a fire present. That it fell as per a controlled demolition - some 8 hours later.
Burning jetfuel, for an hour and an hour and forty minutes - is not enough to account for the catastrophic collapse.
However the pools of molten metal that were still on fire - days afterwards, would probably give a definite clue about the process involved. eg. That higher temperatures would feature in an explosion or explosions, and not from burning jetfuel?
If we did not have so much footage of controlled demolitions recorded - we would otherwise not have the smoking gun levelled at 9-11, to say that the details do not fit the official account of 9-11, but tell of an altogether different story.
Harvey |
Alagna
Member
Post Number: 38
Registered: 07-2011
| | Posted on Saturday, September 17, 2011 - 05:08 pm: |
|
Dear Erik,
I can’t understand how you could have been “…exploring a lot of beam in the last few years,” and then ask such rudimentary questions? I mean most of the answers that you seek are answered all over the place. Please, friend, don’t take this the wrong way, but it seems your level of understanding is equal to a beginner. I suggest you start with http://futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Main_Page.
However, I will answer your questions from my perspective
1. Why do you Paladians keep us in the loop?
First of all Erik, they are “Pleiadians,” well sort of. Actually they are referred to as Plejaren and they keep coming to Earth because they are part of a mission here to assist Billy in disseminating the truth.
2-why is it that we always need to belief and are we need able to see for ourselfs?
We don’t always need belief. In fact we don’t need it at all. All it does is make us stall. For example, I personally don’t believe that Billy Meier is telling the truth. But rather Billy Meier is telling the truth because I have spent years exploring Beam and analyzing and contemplating what is being said; and it all can easily be seen in nature or proven with reason or logic, so I think Billy Meier is telling the truth.
3-You say we got free will and you cant interfer and that we should al do it ourselfs. but we al know this is not the case .becouse Mankind have been manipulated and the genes alterd from the begining of times.
so there is no free choice .There Is ONLY Belief?”
What are you talking about my good man? There is always free choice. You must believe in a god and been told not to think for yourself? This is what "religion" is, not Figu. Stand tall. Just as you can exercise your body and gain muscle and stamina, so too can you exercise your mind to become more powerful. But if you believe something you are not thinking. You are not growing and learning. You my friend are a powerful being, with no shackles, and you too can exercise your own free will by being responsible to yourself. Now get cracking another great sight to learn is http://www.TheyFly.com.
4- why is it that the mayority have to belief and Only 1 Or a few can see its true?
Ah you must mean the beamships. I assume you want to see one or go aboard one of the ships and meet one of the Pleiadians. Well, you have much, much, much, etc., learning to do before you are powerful enough to have a useful interaction. And that goes for the majority of the planet, so don’t feel sad; get to work!
5-if you guys ( paladians)gave al this info to jmmanuel,bilie,mohamed and so on and you keep it strictly for the eyes of only them to see.Then its again a religion.
Exactly what your doing now again.
Show yourselfs from the begining in time to everybody.Dont hide.Tell the truth.
Okay Erik, my guess is that you have never visited https://figu.org/shop/. Here you can purchase what the prophets have said. Nothing is hidden. This is a ridiculous assumption, since you can go to sites like futureofmankind and get a lot of it for free! And anybody who has studied the Meier material for "years" at least knows this.
Kind regards,
Anthony |
Kiwilove
Member
Post Number: 65
Registered: 02-2005
| | Posted on Sunday, September 18, 2011 - 08:26 pm: |
|
I can agree that the Billy Meier material is brilliant, insightful, answers many questions, etc - but it will not answer everything - as some material is just too sensitive to be openly disclosed at this time.
But it is good to read that - religions have been misleading mankind for centuries - and even the far east religions do not escape this harsh criticism. But the major three religions - from the Middle East seem to be the worst?
I think many have come to this conclusion by themself - however it is good to see it in black and white print, that you can thoroughly agree with.
I can't see the Billy Meier material being acknowledged in the masses for some time? When will the evidence come forth from other sources, that show that the Plejaren information is correct?
eg. The history of our Earth, and it's many ancient civilisations.
NASA's projection of it's mission to Mars seems so far away - and would they actually disclose what they find there?
Is any of Richard's Hoagland's guesses correct at all? I think the Plejarens say that Erik von Daniken is only around 4% correct with his assumptions and ideas. Meaning that many of what he thought was evidence of alien visitors, was in fact the ingenunity of early Man.
"Ancient Aliens" was a very interesting series, but I do not think all of their ancient sites, etc - had aliens involved with them. Would, though the Plejarens maybe rate that series - maybe around 20% correct with it's guesses? eg. Puma Punku shows alien technology was present. But perhaps Gobekli Tepe was not?
Harvey |
Hendrikus1970
Member
Post Number: 16
Registered: 04-2009
| | Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 01:07 am: |
|
Dear Anthony,
thank you for responding.
im sorry but my english is not al that good so i wil make a few mistakes.
Its true that i have to learn a lot .
One of the reasons of this going very slow is becouse almost everyting is in english and if you dont speak the lingo that wel, then you need to learn that also.
Now iy happens to be the case that not everybody got that time or posibilty.
i know michaels website and think its a great job he is doing ( thank you Michael)
you asked if i would like to hop on board of one of those beamships,lol .
dont We All? yes that would be nice but not nesecuari.
I think there are many ways to improve the mission and not to complicate it any further.
for example :
1-Start early with informing the people
2-Translate every page in al lenguages(idiomas)
3-Make al availble for free to the world
4-Get some peoples favorites on your side ,Singers,Actors,artist( Show them the truth !!)
5-make good movies about this story
6-Give lecture for Free across the world
7-shut down the powerfull elite fakers
8-make this forum more easy in use
9-get a SEO marketeer
10-do a act of good faith for the people of the world.
examples ( Palestina,Afrika,z-america,Asia
i can go on and on with this)or does it get to crowded then ?
I hope and wish you al the best .and yes i wil be studying more .becouse my soul forgat almost all that i knew ,lol( think they pulled a mind trick on me m8,lol)
Thanks again for your respons Anthony
Cheers,
Erik |
Teesoft
Member
Post Number: 29
Registered: 01-2011
| | Posted on Monday, September 19, 2011 - 05:27 am: |
|
Hi Erik Figu is not a church that preach and try to win people to their side....far from it, they provide the truth and anybody who is intrested come for the truth simple as that!
2. About translating the every information regarding the Billy and the P's, On the one hand Figu isn't rich enough to do this and on the other hand the german language is the only language on earth that can explain the spiritual teaching without error of religious term and other identical problem, also about you saying that almost everything is only in english is wrong cus everything is solely in german and their are only few official translated document released by Figu others are translated by individuals, and people like Michael, James Moore and other figu forum moderators who also try in this regard as long as this individuals follow the rule stated by figu that you must translate each text side by side with original german text, and u must also note that only the spiritual teachings in german language was coded as no other terrestrial language was possible to code.
3. Making all information free is really expensive as i mentioned before & as you also know your self our world is run and ruled by money.
4. Getting actors actress and whatever people on your side by showing them the truth is as i mention before another way of preaching which as i think u know is against the rule, and secondly this silent revolution of truth as we call it isn't about sides. Its about every one waking up them selve and pick up the truth and follow them, simple!
5. About making movies i think there has been a movie about this named silence revolution of truth but i haven't seen it so i'm not sure but i could confirm this.
6. Giving lecture free across the world isn't cheap as i mention before and as u know for your self too. Figu isn't rich okay so lecture cannot be given around the world unfortunately for now, lectures are being given like i know Michael Horn give this and it was also being given in switzerland as i read in some of the contact note but i'm not sure if this is still going on.
7. I'm not sure what you mean by shutting down the powerfull elite, but if i should interprete as written then u are talking about either those who deceive the public like fake contactees, religious men of god or the C.I.A either of this it's not Figu mission to deal with any of them cus every life form has free will to do whatever they want even if they are on the wrong track. So its when people starting waking up and thinking for themselves that such people or organization will cease to exist.
8. I also dont understand what you mean by making this forum more easier to use.
9/10. Why will Figu need a SEO marketer and what do you mean by "do a act of good faith for the people of the world. examples ( Palestina,Afrika,z- america,Asia"..... I hope you understand everything i explained and with your word e.g "soul" it shows you still need alot of learning and absorbing on the Billy case, i'm not saying i've read and know everything but with the little i've learned i can say you still need to take time and do alot of reading on this forum and places like James Moore wiki www.futureofmankind.co.uk, u already know Michael website so read and learn all you will understand better. Take care and i wish you luck continue to learn and evolve.
Salome!
Tosin |
|
