| Author | Message | ||
    Scott B. |
Hello Adrian, Yes it is true, that currently the Giza "Intelligences" have been removed from this planet. If you read page 271 of Guido Moosbrugger's book "And Yet They Fly", you will find further information about the Giza Intelligences. I would guess the threat of alien races will always exist to some extent. As I understand it, civilizations which have not achieved the technique of interstellar space travel are protected by more advanced races until that time arrives. I would also assume at the same time these civilizations would have achieved the technique to defend themselves also. It seems on this planet, we have achieved a degree of weaponry in advance of our ability to travel beyond the outer boundaries of our solar system peacefully. Salome Scott Baxter | ||
Ed Unregistered guest |
Hi Adrian and Scott.. Adrian, Scott has filled it all very very correct...I would say. But Still...it is mentioned in the Contact-Notes ...that there are still all sorts of Evil Machinations being performed compromised of spreading False Religious teachings, Deception, and Negatively influencing on particular Human Beings. And them Not even Knowing this. So, it could be Any Leadership on our planet that is Influenced...without these persons even being aware of this. And not to foreget; what the Gize Intelligence have Started....is surely very difficult to Remedy(The Chaos..The Great Wars..The Petty Wars...go so on...). Which Reflects...Today's Existence. Yes, this surely sounds like a Flash Gordon Scenario. As the Black and White Flash Gordon films were Far Ahead of it's time. I would not be surprised if the creator of Flash Gordon Received "Telepathic" Impluses...as the Plejarans have mentioned many time. The Old Black and White Flash Gordon Films are Still My Favorite. This is where Science-Fiction Becomes....Non-Fiction. It is good that our Plejaran Brothers and Sisters Do Watch over us and Keep an Eye on our evolution. As they feel Obligated to Aid us when it is in their possiblity...to do so. Edward. | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 329 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hello, If I remember correctly Billy and or the Plejarens mentioned a number of years ago that there were more people involved in the Kennedy assassination then just Lee Harvey Oswald. It seems the most accepted alternative explanation has been the invisible shooter on the grassy knoll. Recently I had the opportunity to view the Zapruder film. The person that showed me this film offered me another viewpoint of what could have possibly happened, which included Lee Harvey Oswald and the shooter on the grassy knoll, but also another gunman. After looking at the film for at least 20 times, it appeared to me that the Secret Service driver of the limo was the one responsible for firing the fatal shot. Many people when viewing the film naturally look at Mr. Kennedy during his final moments, but if you look at the driver I saw something that I had never noticed before. You can see the driver turn around, point what appears to be a gun, fire it, then pull his arm back and then immediately turn around, all within very brief time. At the time when the film was made there was also a sound recording made. When you match the sound recording up with the footage you can definitely hear 4 shots, with the 3rd shot matching up with the movement of the driver and the sudden reaction of Mr. Kennedy as his head is thrown back indicating being impacted with something very strong. I also examined a still image of this precise moment and you can see the driver turned around with his arm extended towards the rear of the vehicle, and the outline of his hand protruding from the end of his coat sleeve, with a silver object in his hand which resembles some type of weapon. Also it was suggested that the reason Jackie Kennedy attempted to exit the vehicle over the rear trunk was because she saw what had happened and was attempting to save herself, but the Secret Service agent at the rear of the vehicle got her to return to her seat. If anyone has the opportunity to examine this footage, please look at the driver at the moment before Mr. Kennedy is hit and see if you can see what I saw. Thanks for listening Salome Scott | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 238 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi Scott... I have seen the Zapruder Footage/film and it was known to me also that there more then 2 to 3 gunmen. And that Lee Harvey Oswald... Being a "Patsy" to his own...surprise! That it would be Pinned on him. You mentioning the Sceret Service driver..; I would Not be too sure of this movement of his. It has been said he was trying to Pull JFK forwards... to him? The bullets that hit JFK were All of a High-Powered "Rifle calibre"...and Not of a Hand-Pistol what my information is concerned which I have gather throughout the years. Thus, All shot from a Far distance. So it seems that there was a gunman on the grassy knoll...And/Mabye..the gunman taking a shot from between a Fence...nearby at a parkinglot. Which seemed to be the Vital...Front shots! It was even mentioned..that the above mentioned gunmen Both.. almost shot at the same time. But it seems True...that JKF was Also Indeed... shot from the Front. Without a doubt! And concerning the amount of gun shots..this is known to me also. Concerning Jackie Kennedy with her attempt to exit the vehicle; was Not a True Fact; when it was made known by a Secert Service man, that she was So Shocked and was Trying to Gather as much of JFK's Head-Parts as she could..that were spreading all around. As this seemed to be a Reflex-Reaction of her's. Then she was pushsed back into the backseat. Edward. | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 239 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi Scott... Well, I just looked at 'The JFK Assassination:The Jim Garrison Tapes' and it shows the Zapurder footage and One could see clearly...that it was Not the Driver turning towards JFK, but it was Senator Connally; who was also shot by a bullet.The so-called "Ricochet-Bullet". And what you saw as a weapon...was the 'Chroom-Frameing' of the driver's doorwindow Frame. And to be exact concerning Jackie Kennedy; she was picking-up JFK's Brain parts before she went back into the backseat. She held it in her hands till she got to the hospital. And from other investigations; it seems that there was Oswald, a second gunman - at a lower grassy knoll..in the Bush Hedges and third gunman at the higher grassy knoll...which was the Fence at the parkinglot -; whereby there was a Deaf-mute and his father at the time that witnessed a man in an overall with a rifle preparing everything. The father made a remark at the man...but as soon as he waved the rifle towards them...the father and his son went away as fast as they could. "May The Light Of Creation Be With Both...John and Jackie." Edward. | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 330 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hello Edward, Thanks for your comments. After I read your response I again viewed the footage. From what I can tell there were two secret service people seated in the most forward seats. Behind them was were two more people, with Connely I believe seated closest to the camera, and the rear seat occupied by John and Jackie. The movement which I'm am referring to is coming from the most forward seat where the driver is seated. It is not coming from Connely, because I can see Connely at the same time the driver turns around. I would have hard time believing that the secret service driver (William Garrison) was in the position to do anything (reaching for Mr. Kennedy) considering the distance between Mr. Kennedy seated to the rear and the driver seated to the front of the vehicle. As I mentioned before you can see him turn around, point something, and then pull his arm back down and turn around. We may never know concretely what occurred, but I just found this very interesting considering the many stories that have been floating around for decades. Salome Scott | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 241 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi Scott... Well, if the Secret Service agent next to the driver Did Pull-out Something(his Gun...???)...I would think this was just his "Reflex-Reaction".. as it is known to manifest when there is a shooting; so this is just a procedure...of action. As I would think you and I would do also...if in such position. So, he may have just Drawn his Gun out of Reflex. As anyone would do. I can not recollect Billy mentioning the details of this event. So, indeed...it gives us Room....to Think and Analys this event for our selves. Edward. | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 388 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hello, On the German portion of the FIGU website Billy answers a question regarding the difference between robots and androids. I'm assuming the answer he gives is in reference to the androids, which are used by the Plejarens. Billy goes on to say these artificial life forms or androids are a combination of mechanical, electronic and bioorganic construction. This reminds me of what many of us have seen in regards to the Terminator Movie series in which the "Terminator" is constructed in a similar way. Although the intent behind the construction of these androids on TV or the Movies is based on the idea of a killing machine, which is impervious to any type of pain etc., the Plejaren androids are designed with a more benign intent. In Billy's response he states these androids are covered with 1.5-2 meters of bioorganic tissue dependent on the size of the android. This tissue is made up of two layers, consisting of the epidermis or outer layer and the subcutaneous layer consisting of connecting and fatty tissue. The skin provides heat regulation and the admission of sensory input from the outside environment as well other important functions. The brain, which is bioorganic as is the skin, is modeled after the human brain. This brain allows the android independent thinking, recognizing and the ability to make decisions as well as the capability of learning. What I found interesting is that the programming of the brain is done in a way that the android never conducts itself in a degenerative way or acts in a way that is destructive to life outside of itself. As a result of the artificial brain there is also an artificial Psyche, which is capable of feelings to a degree. In addition these androids even though they are part bioorganic do not eat meals as we do, but do require certain nutrients, which do not leave waste products within the brain or skin. Apparently they also have devices within the android, which generate needed energies in addition to the cosmic energies it receives, as do humans. I thought this was a very interesting article and I feel as time progresses and we as humans survive this new millennium, we may at some point in the future be able to have such devices at our fingertips. (If I have made any mistakes in regards to this article, please anyone correct me..thanks) Salome Scott | ||
Markc Member Post Number: 57 Registered: 06-2000 |
Hi Scott ; In Contact 10 , I believe ,Quetzal tells Billy about an android that developed a degenerative pattern and destroyed itself by way of some type of depression ( this may be the wrong word). Also it was starting to infect another android with it's malicious virus , or whatever it was that was bugging it . Salome , Mark | ||
Howard Member Post Number: 40 Registered: 05-2003 |
Is it true that livingcabable individualy-thinking androids is developed on a much higher evolutionary step that ours? about the plejaren step? That would mean its QUITE a long time before we will make those ourselves... | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 389 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hi Howard, According to the information Billy has shared with us, yes this is true. Billy did say he encounterd these androids during his 5 day space trip on the great mother ship. How many years into our future is unknown at this point. As I understand it the Plejarens are approx. 8000 years ahead of us technically, but many millions of years beyond us spiritually. Skin is already being grown to treat burn victims, and robotic type devices have been around for sometime. So I think we are seeing the very early stages of this type of technology, but merging the two together to create thinking robot/biological beings may take considerable time. What is troublesome to me, is if this technology does come into being, who will use it and how will it be used...... Salome Scott | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 408 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hello, As of 9/11/2003 "For the first time in over 2 years HAARP has been extremely active with almost continuous transmissions over the last 6 days at maximum power." I guess we can all look forward to a boiled atmosphere and brains to along with it! More information can be read on the Jeff Rense website. Salome Scott | ||
Inger New member Post Number: 1 Registered: 02-2000 |
Hello all, Since a planet in its own evolution only bring forth one specific human race, what criteria are the basis of what skin colour and appearance that human race is given when a planet brings forth human life? Does anyone know? Regards, Inger | ||
Howard Member Post Number: 80 Registered: 05-2003 |
Hi Inger, are you in contact with FIGU study group in sweden? I would like to hear if there are more contactnotes available to buy, exept for the 26 first. Thank you, Howard | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 321 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi Inger... Very Very Good Question! I think that would be a very good question to ask Billy on the next Question Round!? Don't you think so? My Own Idea and Thoughts, would be that the "Composition" of the Planet and it's "Structure-Build-Up"...would Reflect..How and What Type(s) of (Human) Being(Creatures) would Result into. Thus, it Depends on the Factor(s) that would Generate the Living Spieces..that will be Part of the Planets.."Care Takers"... if I may say it this way. I do see...ALL that is Created Onto a Material Planet as being Part of the Plante's Evolution "Source" ...To "Aid/Assist"...it with it's Evolution...in the Concerning Creation..where it is a Fragment of. Thus, Colour(and Form) would Also be a Reflection...there of. As Every Creation..just like every Universe(s)...Differ... Because of the above mentioned Process(ing). Thus, just depending on what Processing Level or Consciousness...if you will...it has to Manifest/Experience into. As some may Know, that even every New Born Universe...is made up of many Different elements(Gases..etc..), thus are Not always the same(Even in Colour!!). Thus, can you See/Understand the Resemblance? Thus, That and That Elements..Generate....That Colour....and go so on...Thus it depends on It's "Ingredients"...to Simply state it. Example: When a planet is New-Born, the planet's Consciouness would "Adapt" itself to the Processing of the Material-Mass of the planet...of it's Build-Up. Creating Micro Elements to suit it as it Evolves, as these elements just gradually Also Adapt themselves to the Evolving planet, thus, Changes..when needed..the elements. Just like on our Earth planet; thus...Microbes...etc.., than gradually we have Bigger Creatures...- The Animal Kindom - to Care For IT...and Than the it would come to a Stage to Perfect..Itself...buy Generating a Human-like Creature(s)..which is much and much More "Finer"...and capable of "Progressing" as a "Thinking" Being/Enity/Body. Thus, with It's/Their...Perfection...put the "Fine..Finishing Touches"..if I may say it this way...to the Evolving Planet (and Themselves)....which Both have "Benefit"... from. Thus this would Create.."The Equalibrium" and..."Perfection"...for All Living Creatures...on the Mother Planet....and The Planet...Herself. Thus, if We Take Good Care of The Planet....She Will Take Good Care Of Us! Thus will Also...Benefit...The Absolute Absolutum! But again....these are just My Thoughts. Edward. | ||
Inger New member Post Number: 3 Registered: 02-2000 |
Hi Howard, Yes, I'm in contact with the Swedish group. As I know no further contact notes are translated into Swedish, but 2 or 3 of the Special Bulletins are. A few excerpts from different texts or conversations are also translated, but I'm not sure if these are official translations or not. So there do exist a little more Swedish material than the first 26 contacts. Kind regards, Inger | ||
Inger New member Post Number: 4 Registered: 02-2000 |
Hi Edward, Thanks for your answer. Interesting reading indeed, your point of view. I've been thinking a lot of this. And I know other people that are very curious about this too. Thinking, wondering. Anyway, I have followed your suggestion and did post this question to Billy as well. Maybe we all will see what he has to say too. Kind regards, Inger | ||
Howard Member Post Number: 98 Registered: 05-2003 |
Hi Inger, thanks for your response! You could e-mail me if you want if there are any more translations available at haavardro@hotmail.com. Thanks, Howard | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 329 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi Inger.... Yes that would be a good idea...and Well In it's Place. Than I would know myself...  Edward. | ||
Scott Moderator Post Number: 422 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hello, According to the Plejaren information Mt. Chimborazo is the highest peak when measured from the center point of the earth. Mt. Chimborazo is 20,700 feet above sea level and Mt. Everest is 29,028 above sea level, but when measured from the center of the planet Mt. Chimborazo is approximately 2,150 (7,053 feet) meters taller. Now I find it is interesting that although Mt. Chimborazo is considered to be the highest peak, is it the highest mountain? It has been discovered that Mt. Mauna Kea in the Hawaiian Islands while only measures 13,796 feet above sea level, but the base of this mountain measured from its base on the sea floor measures approx. 20,000 to sea level. This translates into a mountain over 33,000 feet in height. While not the highest peak, can it be considered the highest mountain measured from its base? Anyone have any comments on this? Salome Scott | ||
Savio Member Post Number: 448 Registered: 07-2000 |
Hi Scott I would agree that the centre of the earth is the true reference, all other references are observed differently from place to place Regards Savio | ||
Michael Member Post Number: 413 Registered: 10-2000 |
I think this article is required reading, especially for all Americans, and anyone else who wants to know more about the nature of cover-ups: http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/1932/ Michael Horn | ||
Edward Member Post Number: 365 Registered: 05-2002 |
Hi All... You may all find this very interesting. From - Stimme der Wassermannzeit - Contact 241-243, Monday, February 3, 1992, 11:33 p.m. Page 10 Ptaah: Soon another marriage will break up in the British Royal Family, namely that of Andrew and his wife. Andrew's wife has had a relationship with another man for some time now. In addition to her inability to behave according to the strict royal etiquette, this will be the cause for the marriage break-up. Result: Prins Andrew/1960 -Duke of York- was married to m.Sarah Ferguson/1959. Despite their love for each other, the Duke and Duchess of York drifted apart. Fergie became involved with an American businessman, Steve Wyatt, and their relationship was trumpeted in the press. The Duke and Duchess of York's separation was announced in March of 1992. Fergie began seeing more of another male friend, John Bryan, who also became her business advisor. In August of 1992 an English tabloid published photos of Fergie, topless, having her feet kissed by Bryan. The duchess was humiliated. Later Bryan embarrassed her further by selling lurid (and false, according to Fergie) tales of his affair with her to another tabloid. The Yorks' divorce became official in April of 1996. source: www.royalty.nu Edward. Hi Edward, I have moved this post out of the section you posted it in "Third World War". Please post in the category, which is relevant to your post. Thank you-Moderator |
