Author |
Message |
   
Earthling Member
Post Number: 68 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 01:35 am: |
|
After writing to Patrick Bellringer, he has updated his links to include the TJ. |
   
Earthling Member
Post Number: 69 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 02:49 pm: |
|
Adam - point taken. However, it was a joke borrowed/stolen from a 'Holy' man. Is there no room for some humor around here? Of course other people may change or alter their name for personal or practical reasons. In fact, our very own Herr Meier has taken on an American nickname, right out of American folklore history; the colorful outlaw 'Billy the Kid'. I find it kind of funny & ironic that an 'American' name has stuck considering all Billy has spoken out against America. Odd, no? |
   
Phenix Member
Post Number: 120 Registered: 07-2008
| Posted on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 09:39 pm: |
|
Guten Morgen Kamerad Earthling, The Association between Herr Meier's Nickname, Billy, and the USA could show once more how All-Embracing Creation is - Heed to Creation, indeed! As for your Intention, well, you got me! Humor: I wonder, whether the following would make it through: 'Der Sieger, oder der klügste gibt nach! Immer! Oder...? In einem gutgeleiteten Restaurant bestellte sich Max Reger einen Hummer. Als der Kellner den Zehnfüßigen Krebs brachte, fiel dem Komponisten auf, dass der Hummer nur eine Schere hatte. Auf seine Beanstandung erklärte der herbeigeeilte Geschäftsführer indigniert: "Es kommt vor, mein Herr, dass die Hummer miteinander kämpfen, und da reißt der eine dem anderen manchmal eine Schere aus." "Also so ist das", lächelte Max Reger freundlich, " nun gut, dann lassen Sie mir bitte den Sieger servieren." (Aus der Wochenzeitung "Rheinischer Merkur", Köln)' See you at the Peace Meditation of the First Saturday of the Month, that is: Saturday, 1st November: Zurich 6:30pm (note change from previous time) Los Angeles 10:30 am Zurich 8:00pm Los Angeles 12:00 noon. Sunday, 2nd November: Zurich 8:00pm Los Angeles 11:00 am. (Source: Post 245 of Kamerad Indi-Robjna, 04 Oktober 2008; Section 'Meditation';More Information here: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html) Salome. Adam. |
   
Markcampbell Member
Post Number: 10 Registered: 10-2008
| Posted on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 11:26 pm: |
|
No. |
   
Badr Moderator
Post Number: 425 Registered: 12-2004
| Posted on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 03:03 am: |
|
can you guys please get back to the topic!! |
   
Pathfinder Member
Post Number: 8 Registered: 10-2008
| Posted on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 02:36 am: |
|
I would love to see a little humor here and there myself, but I find that I always get into trouble using it where people take it the wrong way on these boards. Intent does not always come out in the typing. As for EM's nickname. I am going to refuse to use it as I have been told that it was not selected by him personally but given to him by people that wanted to describe him by his cowboy like way of dressing. i would have thought Indiana Jones more applicable but maybe that was before that movie. regardless, from what I understand the Plejarens had asked that the name Billy not be used by us because they frowned on the comparison to Billy the kid, an outlaw and killer, but because the name was already so commonly used people could just not drop it so easily and the name stuck despite their concern. It was not EM's choice to have that name and I am sure if it had been up to him he would also have wanted to honor the advice of the Plejarens. What are your thoughts? Don't just follow the laws of creation, feel them!
|
   
Scott Moderator
Post Number: 1575 Registered: 12-1999
| Posted on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 03:13 am: |
|
One more time, this topic area is concerning the Talmud. |
   
Pathfinder Member
Post Number: 11 Registered: 10-2008
| Posted on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 05:03 am: |
|
i see i am replying to posts that people are making in the wrong categories without checking for that myself. Sorry for the disruption. I guess it is necessary to check the categories posts are made under ahead of time to see if there will be any conrinuation of a disruption by our replies. Don't just follow the laws of creation, feel them!
|
   
Earthling Member
Post Number: 346 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 03:18 am: |
|
Fascinating details about Jmmanuel, as translated by Benjamin. http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=386805075&blogId=524446925 |
   
Aburns87 Member
Post Number: 10 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 05:47 am: |
|
thank you for the share... |
   
Jim Member
Post Number: 99 Registered: 07-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 09:54 am: |
|
Earthling, It's good to have Benjamin's translations of Contact Notes, from his blog, even though they are not official. The one you linked to above is for #213 in 1986. In the middle of it he placed the article from my website file, www.tjresearch.info/tombsite.htm , which I wrote myself. For some strange reason, he prefaced it by saying: "Translator's Note: The following article, which is found in this Contact Report of the original German book, appears in English and, thus, is an authorized and official translation." However, my article could not have appeared in this Contact Report, #213 of 1986, as I did not write it until around 2000. The information in my article came a bit from Bruni Koye of FIGU, in the 1990s, who quizzed Meier at times, and later from Christian Frehner, with photos from Michael Hesemann. So, my article is no translation and is not authorized in any way that I know of. |
   
Earthling Member
Post Number: 347 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 02:46 pm: |
|
Jim, obviously Benjamin made an erroneous assumption regarding your article as an authorized and official translation. Please leave him a comment. I am sure he will be happy to make the proper corrections and explanations. |
   
Earthling Member
Post Number: 351 Registered: 05-2008
| Posted on Tuesday, January 12, 2010 - 08:07 am: |
|
fm Contact 213 - Tuesday, December 2, 1986, 3:17 AM http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=386805075 Billy: Thank you. Yes, that’s it – exactly. As you know, I’ve gathered and calculated a lot with regard to the Christian calendar. You’ve also told me that I had calculated very precisely and that only small errors were contained in my calculations. With respect to these calculations, I have endeavored again and recently discovered that the actual birth of Jmmanuel must have taken place not four, six, or even seven years before the Christian calendar but rather five years. This means that Jmmanuel effectively must have seen the light of this world five years before the Christian calendar. Through a past viewing, I also discovered that at the time of his birth, not only was a beaming spaceship visible in the sky, but also actually a very large comet, which could be seen all over the world, namely for about several weeks. Quetzal: 160. Your explanations are correct. 161. And since you alone have now found the true facts, nothing more stands in the way for me to tell you further details. 162. The exact year of Jmmanuel’s birth was five years before the Christian calendar known today. 163. At that time, there actually was a very large and unusually strongly radiating comet that was observable from the Earth, which we call the “Fruitful One,” because from very early times, inseminations for the Earth and for the planet Phaeton, respectively Malona, have gone out from it, by what means life could develop on these two SOL satellites. 164. The “Fruitful One,” however, has an extremely long period of revolution on a path that leads far out into the Oort cloud. 165. Accordingly, it will take more than 11,000 years, according to Earth’s measure of time, before a return of this comet occurs in the SOL system. 166. Its orbital period is 13,200 years. 167. Together with this event of the appearance of the “Fruitful One,” the birth of Jmmanuel also took place on the 3rd of February, five years before the Christian calendar, whereby the 3rd of February of today's calendar is converted for the time and the day of that time. 168. At that same time, when Jmmanuel was born, in order to monitor and supervise everything, a large Plejaren beamship was stationed high in the atmosphere over Bethlehem. 169. This radiated very brightly, for it was one of those aircraft that collect energy from the atmosphere, which light up, radiating very strongly, when they penetrate into the area of the Verwerteranlage (?), through which anti-gravity is produced. |
   
Smukhuti Member
Post Number: 199 Registered: 06-2009
| Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 07:06 pm: |
|
Tdunn, with reference to your question in "Application of Natural Logic" section, which part you feel are common to TJ and Satanic Bible? Could you please elaborate? Salome. Suv
|
   
Thomas Member
Post Number: 844 Registered: 03-2004
| Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 10:06 am: |
|
In the Talmud Jmmanuel it is written that someone need only ask honestly of Creation and it will provide what is needed. It is said that a parent would not give his child a stone if asked for food or something along those lines. I used to think that was not a literally intended idea. I have come to see it somewhat differently now. The first problem probably comes with people assuming that Creation "thinks like a human being" because Creation is far beyond what we can even imagine in its knowledge and logic. In fact, Creation in its wisdom need not address any of us in a personal nature because Creation IS all of us and Creation has already planned ahead for all of our needs well in advance. If we need anything at all within the realm of what Creation allows, then the possibility is there for us to ask for and to have exactly whatever it is we search for. In asking for something with honesty, we must also accept that Creation will provide (or rather HAS provided) a method for us to receive that thing or situation which is not in line with what our severely limited thinking has thought of. We can have whatever we want as long as it does not work against Creation fundamentally. All we have to do is open our eyes to the possibilities in front of us and to not close our eyes to things which we don't know can happen at any given moment. Think back to some of the surprises that have occurred in a positive manner during your own life. Many times those things were completely unexpected (such as maybe meeting a special someone for example). Life can work in ways unthought of without breaking any laws of physics, and without the need for any so called magic... patricksdadinfrance@yahoo.com
|
   
Memo00 Member
Post Number: 415 Registered: 03-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 06:00 am: |
|
hello Thomas Jmmanuel doesn´t said that whatever you ask to Creation would be granted, instead it said the same but about the Spirit (meaning Consciousness) it is on Chapter 7 / Response to Prayer i think this have to do with many things, like self-suggestion, attraction/repulsion of the things through the power of thoughts, self-knowledge, self-control, and more. take care |
   
Thomas Member
Post Number: 849 Registered: 03-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 08:43 am: |
|
I stand corrected Memo :-) I think you are correct also in the sense that the power of our consciousness makes anything potentially possible if we know how to use it..."it" being our consciousness powers (which are powered by the spirit of course). patricksdadinfrance@yahoo.com
|
   
Gaiaguysnet Member
Post Number: 1020 Registered: 03-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 02:13 pm: |
|
Hi all, Billy explains that the word "spirit" (Geist) was used in Jmmanuel's times instead of "consciousness" (Bewusstsein) because the latter concept was beyond general comprehension. Cheers! Dyson |
   
Elreyjr Member
Post Number: 109 Registered: 01-2009
| Posted on Saturday, March 13, 2010 - 02:45 pm: |
|
Greetings Robyn and Scott, FYI, the topic area on The Talmud Jmmanuel appears with a lock (closed) and yet members can post just the same, just like this one. It drives away interest to post. http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/2200/2200.html?1268493879 An adjustment maybe in order? Jun My will be done. |
   
Indi Moderator
Post Number: 425 Registered: 06-2006
| Posted on Saturday, March 13, 2010 - 05:08 pm: |
|
Jun, the padlock is to indicate that no new threads can be created in that folder. It is not an indicator that the topic is 'blocked'. Robyn |
   
Elreyjr Member
Post Number: 110 Registered: 01-2009
| Posted on Sunday, March 14, 2010 - 12:55 am: |
|
Indi, for my better understanding, may I point out that under the Topic Area "Books and Booklets" we have Talmud Jmmanuel, then under it General Area, then the Archives by dates all of which are under the boxes with a heading "Thread". Which is/are then the "Thread" which we can no longer create once a padlock is placed? Jun My will be done. -------- Jun, their is an hierarchy of headings within the forum: Topic (a folder) is composed of Threads (file within a folder). However some threads have 'sub-threads' within them, which is recognizable by the thread being a folder instead of a file, so it can then contain more of these sub-threads). With the TJ thread, it was purposefully divided into chapters as threads within the main thread for the benefit of discussion ease. The padlock is saying to you that the 'sub-threads' (the chapters and general section within the TJ Thread, are set by the moderators, and cannot be added to at this time. If you have a 'sub-thread' you think should be there, then present it to the moderators and it will be considered. I am not sure if I can explain it any further. Robyn (Message edited by indi on March 14, 2010) |
   
Elreyjr Member
Post Number: 112 Registered: 01-2009
| Posted on Sunday, March 14, 2010 - 07:16 pm: |
|
Hi Indi, thank you so much for your wholehearted and tireless effort and for your very prompt explanation. Please move this post to a more appropriate area or completely disregard, at your discretion. If you and the other Moderators may, please consider: instead of calling every item under a Topic area immediately as a "thread", call them appropriately as follows if they are: 1) Sub-Topic like the Talmud Jmmanuel and 2)Discussion Area like General Area; Chapter 1 to....and so on. The idea being that the "thread" respectively "postings" under the proposed sub-topic or at times under discussion area and even under the Thread/Postings itself does not need to be padlocked, anyways, because every time it is created as an archive, the next postings will automatically be for as of another date to be archived later on. To padlock it will be a redundancy, imo. Therefore, the note with a padlock icon may be reworded to emphasize it is about a sub-topic or discussion area and not merely referring to a thread. Unless and until you really would not accept any thread, respectively posting, by which time you could now simply remove the message box preventing any postings to be made/created, as is the practice for all archived thread/postings. As an alternative, call the "Thread" box "Posts" box instead and let all others remain as a "Thread" box. The above is not for me but for the future visitors of the forum who would rather preoccupy themselves with reading the materials. Peace to all beings. Jun My will be done. |
|